Re: [trill] 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-trill-ribridge-multilevel-00.txt. (11/24 to 12/8/2015)

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Thu, 10 December 2015 02:30 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4401ACD05; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 18:30:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oeVmarbUiPJi; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 18:30:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22c.google.com (mail-oi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23A4C1ACCF0; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 18:30:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by oixx65 with SMTP id x65so37579780oix.0; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 18:30:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=taVqviEgC12fo6p2e+KKOwg1sOMoLIN0H4GzQmfYEOE=; b=pdbc4HwvmOy+A7dBngDeJvUhkR+UAHUlcmvvI8/DfhyAxH+GKGSM0NjK+lUMBx45s0 U+mYjUCLH9OCc7AdLCrHbpIf4ekAdUykC6KObdQAAHq6pkdcxHbmMv0e/p0yGU+/VLaL YbOqHWtxRa7pKgPUu46Uk9d9wlf6qj5uk8j/xI6utld8sTuPzCQq13sPEq2VlPchEn3L etUNOYIxMkYKan34OlJFPF5ItPOYAKHTfedr+1kI7A0G0kdUYk2K2unz+p0ZoLuPIP6Z 2Y6gGnf8YwOE1orIaf9PO0slDmIA4SU3A2yJ8Nr+ol0UUVZSIUvAKa9rA6iYn4NA+DRf lang==
X-Received: by 10.202.75.1 with SMTP id y1mr7308866oia.42.1449714616615; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 18:30:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.19.102 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 18:30:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <051901d126a1$1dd20bb0$59762310$@ndzh.com>
References: <051901d126a1$1dd20bb0$59762310$@ndzh.com>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 21:30:02 -0500
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEG9AWDJYUX3_phEPWTxbeNBpBD9B1QZWrykw7=C8=QNYw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c15cfabfc8bb052681fccb
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trill/cslcd2YmcUfO2se8NUsrWaE8WPs>
Cc: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>, draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-multilevel@ietf.org, "trill@ietf.org" <trill@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [trill] 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-trill-ribridge-multilevel-00.txt. (11/24 to 12/8/2015)
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trill/>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 02:30:18 -0000

Hi,

I am not aware of any IPR other than that which has already been declared
to the IETF.

This document is in good shape and I believe it usefully explains and
surveys the benefits and alternatives for multi-level TRILL.

I'm not sure this document will be "critical" in 5 years since by then
specific technical standards for multilevel TRILL should have been
published.

Thanks,
Donald
=============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 5:15 AM, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:

> TRILL WG:
>
>
>
> This begins a 2 week WG LC on
> draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-multilevel-00.txt.   This draft is going for
> informational RFC to explain the two technical approaches for extending
> TRILL protocol to be multi-level.
>
>
>
> Please note that this draft has 2 IPR:
>
>
>
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1813/
>
>
>
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1579/
>
>
>
> Each author of this draft should respond on the list if they know of
> additional IPR.
>
>
>
> The IESG has recently asked WGs to consider the value of information
> documents now and in 5 years.  Therefore, in your comments regarding WG LC,
> please consider:
>
> a)      Is the draft technically ready for WG last call?
>
> b)      Will this architectural type draft be useful to you as you
> explain these two options of multi-level TRILL?
>
> c)       Will this architectural document be critical in 5 years for
> TRILL deployments?
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Sue Hares and Jon Hudson
>
>
>
>