Re: [trill] 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-trill-ribridge-multilevel-00.txt. (11/24 to 12/8/2015)

Mohammed Umair <> Mon, 04 January 2016 12:47 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFF51A886F for <>; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 04:47:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v3isRJZ5dPsO for <>; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 04:47:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDA601A886E for <>; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 04:47:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id o62so248823285oif.3 for <>; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 04:47:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20150623; h=from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:thread-index:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=L48ePTS819eNDNMH1WlsymyKEjGvPhbqo2d625jC8sE=; b=VlTgoTpIpSY9ZYqmJdYPiLqeMzTyj/bpIhfYyIInCcpY5t4/m9zhtFlWR6FF1Ns6DR 6Lp7SG0m9KH0ADJeDWouIf5jSFlKDa5zfhVe9GHtMTLOE7EWktgKMtcTtqbQPq5BxXyV 97ybTFIg6gpDxblx4ryrFKkHfWbhYBEwFXaDsgbeBW8uNq9COqd3h/gK3VBEPBW+KHgI vYg+Is1PN7tlzTDwlmv5erAeiDsT6E1uCht2shQwtTPreW8tLXVdy5ps3fES96Hyf1bw CF1vKEFR74O7ygmScI2/UhZhl3XlyPWsB2oMCKlnW8mQ2brZnax7L4TNcWS4rD0mcMaK U/eA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :thread-index:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=L48ePTS819eNDNMH1WlsymyKEjGvPhbqo2d625jC8sE=; b=iPl3+/yNF9STYxA/U+w27FJAROGRF01cknBuwG23B408V+lJd2AOkQCpUXkcKa3XOh 3au4HBnr7iW3CXsklZr1vqwbQx8XRbQ8kJuXR6+Np7a4ulCwKPAT+zAPIKAwgYIZ/PAF ha6X62r0aG+4XFnnU0yZl5zqTL2Omwapp2+r/kuxA/wymGYo+NTSHS38VmmyhCoVrFA0 HMLyDbnE0Z6xb7lC4vRagb1xNessI2X0P0cs0Lw+tZ92WZqTY0I6dmPq5uuXhDWX2Qf1 fwMyrejUYhVsvaCc9zbS6JXcGb9F5OklJEIbTih8oT+nwUSQdEpHL2SJ3TlFUayvULdJ m6jA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmHRCBN7hq7vw8fn2az+yrhkxSLBcaqQrn1LhYqjO3jNjMF9kR3QZKQrwCNZ6VyeMySSLdkwk28+Df/7rv0oj+zJWqr/oyZYUTHj0bWS5RktMDZIPN/86RJJ4ijQldNnHFlAchHXjtiSzhLz9J2CsVGYoa96anFyFENW+hBkE2Lbrlbu8L3mlOVyWL6lfkAHWlk9rFKTTQh2UKmu0EcKEFDxNz5l1d/0xLfGBCXNeG1arAp7Gc=
X-Received: by with SMTP id n7mr58722473oif.55.1451911624306; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 04:47:04 -0800 (PST)
From: Mohammed Umair <>
References: <051901d126a1$1dd20bb0$59762310$>
In-Reply-To: <051901d126a1$1dd20bb0$59762310$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQMurNDHlwKyqEr59jbhRSe1RY1M7Jwwf9qQ
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:17:05 +0530
Message-ID: <>
To: Susan Hares <>,,
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d70329cd4250528818454
Archived-At: <>
Cc: Donald Eastlake <>, Alia Atlas <>, Jon Hudson <>
Subject: Re: [trill] 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-trill-ribridge-multilevel-00.txt. (11/24 to 12/8/2015)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 12:47:06 -0000


I think draft is ready for last Call. This draft solves multiple TRILL
scalability issues and hence critical in future TRILL development.



*From:* trill [] *On Behalf Of *Susan Hares
*Sent:* Tuesday, November 24, 2015 3:46 PM
*Cc:* 'Donald Eastlake'; 'Jon Hudson'; 'Alia Atlas'
*Subject:* [trill] 2 week WG LC on
draft-ietf-trill-ribridge-multilevel-00.txt. (11/24 to 12/8/2015)


This begins a 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-multilevel-00.txt.
This draft is going for informational RFC to explain the two technical
approaches for extending TRILL protocol to be multi-level.

Please note that this draft has 2 IPR:

Each author of this draft should respond on the list if they know of
additional IPR.

The IESG has recently asked WGs to consider the value of information
documents now and in 5 years.  Therefore, in your comments regarding WG LC,
please consider:

a)      Is the draft technically ready for WG last call?

b)      Will this architectural type draft be useful to you as you explain
these two options of multi-level TRILL?

c)       Will this architectural document be critical in 5 years for TRILL

Thank you,

Sue Hares and Jon Hudson