Re: [trill] WG Adoption call for draft-muks-trill-transport-over-mpls (2/22 to 3/7/2016)

Support as non-coauthor. It seems to solve an important problem in a
straightforward, technically sound way. Although I didn't notice any
technical issues, it sure could use some copy-editing.  For example:

When a TRILL Data frame traverse
a Distribution Tree, it will adhere to it even in other TRILL site. If
there is no end-station service is enabled for a particular Data-label
in a TRILL site, Distribution Tree will be pruned and TRILL data frames
of that particular Data-label will never enter in to that TRILL site.

But the English can be cleaned up later.

Radia

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:

> This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for
> draft-muks-trill-transport-over-mpls-01.txt.  The draft is available at;
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-muks-trill-transport-over-mpls/
>
>
>
> In this WG adoption call please:
>
> 1)      Indicate if connecting TRILL campuses (Data Center or other) via
> MPLS is a deployment of TRILL that you feel is required in today’s
> networks.  It would be particularly help if you know of a deployment where
> two TRILL campuses need to be connected via MPLS.
>
> 2)      Indicate whether this document is a reasonable basis on which to
> standardize this work,
>
> 3)      Indicate if you feel there are any technical problems with this
> draft
>
>
>
> Sue Hares
>
> _______________________________________________
> trill mailing list
> trill@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
>
>