IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [trill] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-trill-oam-framework-00

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Tue, 13 November 2012 23:41 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C66921F8540 for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:41:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zdglgPqtirtG for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:41:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-f172.google.com (mail-ie0-f172.google.com [209.85.223.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C44E21F853B for <trill@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:41:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id 9so12846250iec.31 for <trill@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:41:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jAmnV09Vbw1HFoqGQ+YmQszXc5yJ/5Jn+ETD/jccID8=; b=JBilwDWroMtdxLNWwhrE6JUV4zUFD50ihkAflL+NkyD7hRN/O0Q4hbGP/rX8+j+Cjc i1ETt/1kUxt9K/tunWeOxe7OyOF3YRtvAsNjWr3J4XyXRY63zHKUyBlaG4kNH+MwSmtj zKf37qUfdj65/Jg+ymKYhWwbePv4xu+8j6Kpx4nYsb/1MKWHmYEi7Fi6yU9AXzQfZsV8 oE2YwvA9zoK9jsXyBHXLvplxbBLoq5SRj0TdSwfFqFBeJmmNG3dtlfYwGPRupQtzObp4 WgPvXjckBv2GdQecMewxgwshOuIk6z/FmAjuWs87FMTY364TPsJHOit9gUhT/8f+sygA PhTQ==
Received: by 10.50.0.179 with SMTP id 19mr87040igf.59.1352850093973; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:41:33 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.176.134 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:41:13 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <48E1A67CB9CA044EADFEAB87D814BFF601B20A@EUSAAMB107.ericsson.se>
References: <48E1A67CB9CA044EADFEAB87D814BFF601B20A@EUSAAMB107.ericsson.se>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:41:13 -0500
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEHy=bN8c6yt82ExczDrY_kj+D07kqFsuPaaG5gc2au_UA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Gray <eric.gray@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "Ralph Droms (rdroms.ietf@gmail.com)" <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>, TRILL Working Group <trill@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [trill] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-trill-oam-framework-00
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 23:41:37 -0000

Hi Eric,

The call by the Chairs to make this OAM framework draft a WG draft was
issued here
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill/current/msg05348.html

Technically, I could argue that there was no need to wait until the WG
meeting before making a determination but we did so the consensus in
the room merely ratified the consensus on the mailing list.

Thanks,
Donald
=============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com


On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Eric Gray <eric.gray@ericsson.com> wrote:
> Donald,
>
>
>
>                 I am confused about something.
>
>
>
>                 During the TRILL WG meeting, I believe we had a consensus of
> the room
>
> to adopt the draft "draft-salam-trill-oam-framework" as a working group
> draft.
>
>
>
>                 It is the case that a "consensus of the room" is not
> sufficient to conclude
>
> working group consensus has been achieved.  The room consensus needs to be
>
> confirmed on the mailing list – usually with a one or two week poll.
>
>
>
>                 Yet draft-salam-trill-oam-framework has been posted as a
> working group
>
> draft (under the name shown in the subject line of this message).
>
>
>
>                 I have looked though my mail and do not see an announcement
> of any
>
> such poll for consensus
>
>
>
>                 Did the poll confirming the sense of the room happen, or
> have we had
>
> a bit of a slip-up?
>
>
>
> --
>
> Eric

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email