[trill] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-trill-mtu-negotiation-06: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Mon, 03 July 2017 21:56 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietf.org
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03AB8127078; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 14:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-trill-mtu-negotiation@ietf.org, trill-chairs@ietf.org, shares@ndzh.com, trill@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.55.2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <149911896201.22803.1033530657723672739.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 14:56:02 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trill/igKWoqOPfE7jWVR5Sbo4G0AlVE4>
Subject: [trill] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-trill-mtu-negotiation-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trill/>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 21:56:02 -0000

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-trill-mtu-negotiation-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trill-mtu-negotiation/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

- 2, first paragraph: "This document specifies a new value "Lz" for the acceptable inter-
   RBridge link MTU size on a local link."

Should "acceptable" be "minimum acceptable"?