[trill] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-trill-ecn-support-05: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Wed, 07 February 2018 14:12 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-trill-ecn-support@ietf.org, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, trill-chairs@ietf.org, shares@ndzh.com, trill@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151801275524.4831.10254430378115618897.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 06:12:35 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trill/m1M7lVsgX6zOgjIzuIELKokcbJg>
Subject: [trill] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-trill-ecn-support-05: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-trill-ecn-support-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trill-ecn-support/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Given L4S is not published yet and in any case experimental, I would recommend
to remove section 4.2 entirely and just keep the appendix as an informational
documentation of the proposed alogrithm.

[trill] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-i… Mirja Kühlewind