Re: [trill] Should we adopt draft-dunbar-trill-directory-assisted-edge-05.txt as a WG document?

+1 support

Thanks
naveen

-----Original Message-----
From: trill-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:trill-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mingui Zhang
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 1:06 PM
To: Erik Nordmark; trill@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [trill] Should we adopt draft-dunbar-trill-directory-assisted-edge-05.txt as a WG document?

I Support it is adopted a WG informational framework draft.

Thanks,
Mingui

> -----Original Message-----
> From: trill-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:trill-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Erik
> Nordmark
> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 2:48 AM
> To: trill@ietf.org
> Subject: [trill] Should we adopt draft-dunbar-trill-directory-assisted-edge-05.txt
> as a WG document?
> 
> 
> <http://http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dunbar-trill-directory-assisted-edge-05
> >
> 
> We've discussed earlier versions of this document in the WG in the past,
> and it seems like useful information for a technique that helps with ARP
> and ND scaling. It does not include any protocol changes or extensions.
> 
> The document is intended as an informational document (it says "Intended
> status: Standard Track" but that is incorrect) explaining how
> directories can fit into TRILL.
> 
> Note that there is claimed IPR associated with the draft:
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1788/>
> 
> Please send comments to the TRILL list before June 27.
> 
> Thanks,
>     Erik
> _______________________________________________
> trill mailing list
> trill@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
_______________________________________________
trill mailing list
trill@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill