IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [trill] WG LC for draft-ietf-trill-mtu-negotiation (3/17 to 4/5/2016)

Liyizhou <liyizhou@huawei.com> Thu, 31 March 2016 08:12 UTC

Return-Path: <liyizhou@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC6112D143 for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 01:12:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.23 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JMOde6O1QglU for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 01:12:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8872312D09D for <trill@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 01:12:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CXO43795; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:12:51 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from NKGEML414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.75) by lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 09:10:51 +0100
Received: from NKGEML513-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.56]) by nkgeml414-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 16:10:44 +0800
From: Liyizhou <liyizhou@huawei.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "trill@ietf.org" <trill@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [trill] WG LC for draft-ietf-trill-mtu-negotiation (3/17 to 4/5/2016)
Thread-Index: AdGAfZokaonWbPLsQJiWoyZtSGkfeQKpn2yg
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:10:43 +0000
Message-ID: <D408889639FC5E4FADB4E00A3E01FA8F9153DEAC@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <01d701d1807e$439b7070$cad25150$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <01d701d1807e$439b7070$cad25150$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.135.180.237]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D408889639FC5E4FADB4E00A3E01FA8F9153DEACnkgeml513mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A0B0201.56FCDC04.020D, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.1.56, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 0eb7ef7c20ddb8c9c27b9480b412cc08
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trill/o4i751LsiyQPmNJsmNyqFN71QsY>
Cc: 'Donald Eastlake' <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, "trill-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <trill-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [trill] WG LC for draft-ietf-trill-mtu-negotiation (3/17 to 4/5/2016)
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trill/>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:12:58 -0000

I believe this document  is ready for publication. Currently no MTU negotiation is used in deployment. Normally we statically set it to maximum value for all links.
Existing approach is not applicable in the case where MTUs are different for different links. So I think it is a useful feature for future deployment.

Thanks,
Yizhou


From: trill [mailto:trill-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 2:53 AM
To: trill@ietf.org
Cc: 'Donald Eastlake'; trill-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [trill] WG LC for draft-ietf-trill-mtu-negotiation (3/17 to 4/5/2016)

This begins a 2 week WG LC for draft-trill-mtu-negotiation from 3/17/2016 to 4/5/2016.

In your review, please comment on the following:

1)      Is this specification ready for publication?

2)      Does the document have any technical or editorial errors?

3)      Is MTU negotiation useful in the deployments of trill on TRILL campuses for link packets that exceed the TRILL campus MTU?  Will this make deployments easier?

Sue Hares and Jon Hudson

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email