X.X Congestion Considerations The bandwidth resources used by RBridge Channel protocols are recommended to be small compared to the total bandwidth of the the links they traverse. When doing network planning, the bandwidth requirements for TRILL data, TRILL IS-IS, the TRILL ESADI protocol, RBridge Channel traffic, and any other link local traffic need to be taken into account. Specifications for particular RBridge Channel protocols MUST consider congestion and bandwidth usage implications and provide guidance on bandwidth or packet frequency management. RBridge Channel protocols can have built-in bandwidth management in their protocols. Outgoing channel messages SHOULD be rate-limited, by configuring the underlying protocols or otherwise, to prevent aggressive connectivity verification or other applications consuming excessive bandwidth, causing congestion or becoming denial-of-service attacks. If these conditions cannot be followed, an adaptive loss-based scheme SHOULD be applied to congestion-control outgoing RBridge Channel traffic, so that it competes fairly, taking into account packet priorities and drop eligibility as indicated in the Inner.VLAN, with TCP or similar traffic within an order of magnitude. One method of determining an acceptable bandwidth for RBridge Channel traffic is described in [RFC3448]; other methods exist. For example, bandwidth or packet frequency management can include any of the following: a negotiation of transmission interval/rate such as that provided in BFD [RFC5880], a throttled transmission rate on "congestion detected" situations, a gradual ramp-up after shutdown due to congestion and until basic connectivity is verified, and other mechanisms. Connectivity chcking applications such as BFD [RFC5880] SHOULD be rate-limited to below 5% of the bit-rate of the associated link or links. For this purpose, the mean or sustained bit-rate of the link or links is used. Incoming RBridge Channel messages MAY be rate-limited as a protection against denial-of-service attacks. This throttling of incoming messages SHOULD honor packet priorities and drop eligibility indications as indicate in the Inner.VLAN, preferentially discarding drop eligible and lower priority packets.