Re: [trill] [RTG-DIR] RtgDir Review: draft-ietf-trill-centralized-replication-05

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Fri, 24 June 2016 04:09 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEG0BXwrd0tPu9OKRKHLpTKNK+AY4Fdoxu9_rfPtRP=xwg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <D3468B9D.3E1EC%keyupate@cisco.com> <CAG4d1reO+WwB5QethGKXc8NiWo1s5yE=2piN-GADJOzaqUWipw@mail.gmail.com> <CAF4+nEG0BXwrd0tPu9OKRKHLpTKNK+AY4Fdoxu9_rfPtRP=xwg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 00:08:52 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEHLEW5BOi5Y3=FYEW6ix+OwwDdzB9PsbCYG=K37Ye_Wog@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Keyur Patel (keyupate)" <keyupate@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trill/p-5najLT02x4f2WoMb1CEGRUb_M>
Cc: Routing Directorate <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, Routing ADs <rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-trill-centralized-replication@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-trill-centralized-replication@ietf.org>, "trill@ietf.org" <trill@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [trill] [RTG-DIR] RtgDir Review: draft-ietf-trill-centralized-replication-05
Precedence: list

Hi Keyur,

Version -06 has been posted which I believe resolves your comments. It
also has other improvements.

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com


On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Keyur,
>
> Thanks for your review. See below:
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 10:41 PM, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Keyur,
>>
>> Thank you very much for your review.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alia
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 6:30 PM, Keyur Patel (keyupate) <keyupate@cisco.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft.
>>> The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related
>>> drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on
>>> special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the
>>> Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see
>>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir.
>>>
>>> Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it
>>> would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last
>>> Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through
>>> discussion or by updating the draft.
>>>
>>> Document: draft-ietf-trill-centralized-replication-05
>>> Reviewer: Keyur Patel
>>> Review Date: 27-Apr-2016
>>> Intended Status: Standards Track
>>>
>>>
>>> Summary:
>>> The document is well written and seems ready for the publication. No major
>>> issues found. Minor nits are listed below.
>
> Thanks.
>
>>> Major Issues:
>>> None.
>>>
>>> Minor Issues
>>>
>>> Intended Status: "Standards Track" Please.
>
> OK, Standard -> Standards
>
>>> Section 1, 3 paragraph: S/will be described/is described.
>
> OK.
>
>>> Section 11.1, Do you need to define any error conditions where multiple
>>> flag bits are set?
>
> It would be pretty peculiar for the the R and C flags to be set on the
> same nickname, since R is normally set on one or a few core switches
> and C is normally set on a large number of edge switches, but I don't
> off hand see any particular problem with both R and C being set on the
> same switch. Traffic should still be delivered correctly. The use of
> the IN flag, specified in RFC 7780, and the SE flag, specified in
> draft-ietf-trill-irb, seem orthogonal; so I don't think there is any
> problem with any combination of flags.
>
> Thanks,
> Donald
> ===============================
>  Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
>  155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
>  d3e3e3@gmail.com
>
>>> Regards,
>>> Keyur

Re: [trill] [RTG-DIR] RtgDir Review: draft-ietf-t… Donald Eastlake
Re: [trill] [RTG-DIR] RtgDir Review: draft-ietf-t… Alia Atlas
Re: [trill] [RTG-DIR] RtgDir Review: draft-ietf-t… Donald Eastlake