Re: [trill] Congestion Considerations for draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-channel

Vishwas Manral <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 05 July 2012 13:53 UTC

Return-Path: <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA4421F84D0 for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 06:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.565
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.565 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VFky2Be5OuRS for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 06:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADEA21F84B9 for <trill@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 06:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbwc20 with SMTP id wc20so15123403obb.31 for <trill@ietf.org>; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 06:53:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Un20lJa6TrTRnsTU0Jbo0vsVktyna8Ry4N2WqdHDznc=; b=J1bTPTeDP1WJiybrqWVaTNJemMSSOBPzIXGFiKLQL/d1JuPAYqq1K+UqSIsPpMmsu5 wL+sL1waW7ETUJexOBAK0BZ+tfL/3irAoUU8ffyufpCLUsDfhFjwQ29uMY+Mw2B3KJ/1 z8xNJOb4wd7JB7peFi5ECfZGWYF03kh8dc8/ubjdWYOLHsFzLYS6QaKqsBlo+IkGRTxU ZweCW0muf5228JT7bBnmpL6y7/r/zvJWaJo9gIsK5dF50PIGwcs8x40+uiySQEJCO0ID tVvx8xjbJVKEk7eYILvUwXWea8voZaCHWbenLVl0aY8ibZzeZ+acSWryy3+H7/pBVaTy BQ/A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.164.10 with SMTP id ym10mr21343805obb.75.1341496403670; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 06:53:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.143.2 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 06:53:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEG=Vq0piU84Ftooi_AeHZK4gwH40zWdR5LoVOeQ+vaOWg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF4+nEG=Vq0piU84Ftooi_AeHZK4gwH40zWdR5LoVOeQ+vaOWg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 06:53:23 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOyVPHTU5=tf1rf=+p2EYaTwTKXMVAOCz9JzQX+788=M83JXvg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vishwas Manral <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e89a8f2344759bb4a304c41578bc"
Cc: trill@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [trill] Congestion Considerations for draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-channel
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 13:53:11 -0000

Hi Donald,

This looks great to me. The only comment I have is the do we need to put in
a number like 5% into the document. I however agree it is to align with
RFC5085, so I understand the rationale.

I guess the guidance would be the same as it would be for say UDP or
applications running over IP.

-Vishwas


On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> wrote:

> In order to resolve a blocking AD comment, we probably need to add a
> Congestion Considerations section to the draft. Attached is a draft of
> such a section that we have come up with, starting from text in RFC
> 5085. Comments welcome.
>
> Thanks,
> Donald
> =============================
>  Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
>  155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
>  d3e3e3@gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> trill mailing list
> trill@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
>
>