Re: [trill] [RTG-DIR] Routing Area Directorate QA review of draft-ietf-trill-transport-over-mpls-02

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Mon, 20 March 2017 07:10 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 563E012714F; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 00:10:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PXAYZGrWzumR; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 00:10:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-x22c.google.com (mail-ot0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE5F2127071; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 00:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id a12so57115929ota.0; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 00:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=t+zAJtqwCljomM0iouGXnarfLOcTy6g1YX0P7/+j91I=; b=A0B2g+JTYnp4FPvMBe1dEUovVr8m70CeuK0SBWdVgmbpueHLnDmAyMvWFP8wYoPjxO u/yq4afa0Zu1OoWOFtgqNwfBaHIVPwoADOXcFMMx1FursLeCp4Eg2tNh0HOQyeYq67PM mwBaDjvLaTqrGo7QEJskjWkR1m4FL2kfK6xiFrvbu90gdG1qq5j1zvR3mFDnOp0oeOc8 4QtHwI5UeT5OrA8LeeAADQK8kVcS0zMC6WyCmmgj+a5VJF7GBRBZGLK+TPHsMLhtC4YW Db0Of9S0XSvzQxUJR4BiIgFgJdfXRSHJgVr+KAM4ChVbMzfTj5MvtNsMyjvfSOXu15c2 q1Kw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=t+zAJtqwCljomM0iouGXnarfLOcTy6g1YX0P7/+j91I=; b=L2T74TI6TsB1inhhLhXVOjiwPacOMTUBcaLCJ5Zg7hFyBZvHSboRI3TDouXYPif8pO VQ5xeJm/fpLqJPsIVCcL5Hi3RTmrJRfWgv8t99yauNDUfU2/Ib/ig/0NUWrD7hDgZf9n 1sN/3THVqN5OdYh0Vq28SEwxda2tYpf14/UILdfkNOOgOj2bkpt6a4R8GXrvXFtD9DoF tjlvJ1t4mfqyEFNkn1VrdodB/TH3NI82lfSCSQ/c9g9jnRul6NlV8AX2dLQfxijj3CfS NxeT8e9/ebXl+CCBWVY6jaFXN9g5glvZGfn5bnreVkXvnXa9BkZqay4CrYpWIby15l9o AgQQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2Jqo7eS+3/Msk6W1NstL/j+jf1GTmiqr4MJazvWP2oVC2I+vwFHsjnMHLBS8cdMn33lOhMNihoIWeXnQ==
X-Received: by 10.157.82.91 with SMTP id q27mr13136990otg.50.1489993827376; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 00:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.231.201 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 00:10:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAM4Z69Rh5VW8eYs_ttHZr2x4+SJW3cUbV7coSxCiebt3T85zLg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8FA0B47D-32C0-41D0-BBDD-35F430DC44EE@nokia.com> <CAA=duU1GQvSgXiiXH9dB9C5wuV+0xXpz4cj1uSvhSMT56Sda5Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAM4Z69Rh5VW8eYs_ttHZr2x4+SJW3cUbV7coSxCiebt3T85zLg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 03:10:07 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA=duU2yOh14wZB6rZSW0_LHh7pg-fFFdr-ChZP2rESErMd2AQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kingston Smiler <kingstonsmiler@gmail.com>
Cc: "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" <matthew.bocci@nokia.com>, "draft-ietf-trill-transport-over-mpls@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-trill-transport-over-mpls@ietf.org>, "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, "trill@ietf.org" <trill@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403043c4028cc6784054b24387d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trill/qyaz2eGwmRyVvQHiGvM-_4uMZw4>
Subject: Re: [trill] [RTG-DIR] Routing Area Directorate QA review of draft-ietf-trill-transport-over-mpls-02
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trill/>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 07:10:30 -0000

Kingston,

On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Kingston Smiler <kingstonsmiler@gmail.com>
wrote:

> <Kingston>
> Typically PBB-VPLS is used to avoid exposing the customer MAC in service
> provider network. In case of TRILL packet over MPLS, already the customer
> MAC is encapsulated inside the TRILL header. Having said that, do we really
> need to consider TRILL over PBB-VPLS.
> </Kingston>
>
>>
PBB (and by extension, PBB-VPLS) is not just used for C-MAC hiding, but
also for provider infrastructure scaling, so I would think the answer is
yes. Matthew, do you agree?

Cheers,
Andy