Re: [trill] Congestion Considerations for draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-channel

This looks good to me as well.

Thanks,
Ayan

On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Vishwas Manral <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Donald,
>
> This looks great to me. The only comment I have is the do we need to put
> in a number like 5% into the document. I however agree it is to align with
> RFC5085, so I understand the rationale.
>
> I guess the guidance would be the same as it would be for say UDP or
> applications running over IP.
>
> -Vishwas
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> In order to resolve a blocking AD comment, we probably need to add a
>> Congestion Considerations section to the draft. Attached is a draft of
>> such a section that we have come up with, starting from text in RFC
>> 5085. Comments welcome.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Donald
>> =============================
>>  Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
>>  155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
>>  d3e3e3@gmail.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> trill mailing list
>> trill@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> trill mailing list
> trill@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
>
>