IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [trill] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-10: (with COMMENT)

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 06 July 2016 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98BAE126B6D; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 10:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TLlKnjQjfnvq; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 10:42:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29EC512D0DB; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 10:42:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.4] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u66Hg4JN092008 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 6 Jul 2016 12:42:05 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.4]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 12:42:04 -0500
Message-ID: <B38AB91C-82E4-49B3-B404-C93665A64638@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEHGBh0bN+HcA+nM1dnvjNfB=uCgyGUi6VrOJ0HrvQmt5A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20160706014632.22399.70754.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAF4+nEHGBh0bN+HcA+nM1dnvjNfB=uCgyGUi6VrOJ0HrvQmt5A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.4r5234)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trill/uXPkAeWtPo7rvwD5li3cC2quu_I>
Cc: draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel@ietf.org, "trill-chairs@ietf.org" <trill-chairs@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "shares@ndzh.com" <shares@ndzh.com>, "trill@ietf.org" <trill@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [trill] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trill/>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 17:42:10 -0000

On 6 Jul 2016, at 12:32, Donald Eastlake wrote:

> Hi Ben,
>
> Thanks for your comment. See below.
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
>> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-10: No Objection
>>
>> ...
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> The reference to RFC 5869 is a normative downref. It's, not mentioned in
>> the last call announcement, nor in the downref registry. I leave it to
>> the AD and authors to decide if that is okay.
>
> I agree with Stephen Farrell that RFC 5869 should be in the downref
> registry and no new Last Call is needed.

I have no objection to that, as long as it is on purpose :-)

Ben.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email