Return-Path: X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58EF6127078 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 23:12:06 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.219 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 65ycIW_Lyut8 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 23:12:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85E5F12717E for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 23:12:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 322E5EB7F9164 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 07:12:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.73) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 07:12:02 +0000 Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by nkgeml412-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.73]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 15:11:58 +0800 From: "Zhangmingui (Martin)" To: Susan Hares , "trill@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [trill] WG Adoption call for draft-eastlake-trill-vendor-channel (11/15 to 11/29) Thread-Index: AdNejL0vVPUsuO6yTmOXNn2xfMPeUwE0q2gQ Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 07:11:57 +0000 Message-ID: <4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E7AAF363F9@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> References: <015a01d35e8d$56622a70$03267f50$@ndzh.com> In-Reply-To: <015a01d35e8d$56622a70$03267f50$@ndzh.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.146.93] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E7AAF363F9NKGEML515MBXchi_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: Re: [trill] WG Adoption call for draft-eastlake-trill-vendor-channel (11/15 to 11/29) X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 07:12:06 -0000 --_000_4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E7AAF363F9NKGEML515MBXchi_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, The vendor channel is useful to be deployed to deliver vendor specific info= rmation. I support its standardization. I am not aware of IPR related to this draft. Thanks, Mingui From: trill [mailto:trill-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 11:45 AM To: trill@ietf.org Subject: [trill] WG Adoption call for draft-eastlake-trill-vendor-channel (= 11/15 to 11/29) TRILL WG: This is a WG adoption call for draft-eastlake-trill-vendor-channel-03.txt (= 11/15 to 11/29). In this WG Adoption call please consider, 1) Is this vendor specific message channel useful to deployments? 2) Is this mechanism ready for standardization? The TRILL WG group mu= st move rapidly from adoption of this draft to WG LC in December? 3) Do you know of any IPR related to this draft? Susan Hares --_000_4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E7AAF363F9NKGEML515MBXchi_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

 

The vendor channel is useful to be deployed to deliver vendor spe= cific information.  I support its standardization.

I am not aware of IPR related to this draft.

 

Thanks,

Mingui

 

From: trill [mailto:trill-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 11:45 AM
To: trill@ietf.org
Subject: [trill] WG Adoption call for draft-eastlake-trill-vendor-ch= annel (11/15 to 11/29)

 

TRILL WG:

 

This is a WG adoption call f= or draft-eastlake-trill-vendor-channel-03.txt (11/15 to 11/29).

 

In this WG Adoption call ple= ase consider,

 

1= )   &= nbsp;  Is this vendor specific= message channel useful to deployments?

2= )   &= nbsp;  Is this mechanism ready= for standardization?  The TRILL WG group must move rapidly from adopt= ion of this draft to WG LC in December?

3= )   &= nbsp;  Do you know of any IPR = related to this draft?

 

Susan Hares

--_000_4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E7AAF363F9NKGEML515MBXchi_--