Re: [Trust-router] Considering delaying BOF Request

Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com> Wed, 15 May 2013 18:04 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: trust-router@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trust-router@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31B0921F8E49 for <trust-router@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2013 11:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q+47ej6HDN4J for <trust-router@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2013 11:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com [23.30.188.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E82C21F8D71 for <trust-router@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2013 11:04:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42BEC20556; Wed, 15 May 2013 14:01:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.suchdamage.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 404tH6zNJRuy; Wed, 15 May 2013 14:01:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (unknown [10.1.10.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 15 May 2013 14:01:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 7BC50440A; Wed, 15 May 2013 14:04:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com>
To: David Chadwick <d.w.chadwick@kent.ac.uk>
References: <tslwqr0gu1p.fsf@mit.edu> <5193AA8E.2020109@kent.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 14:04:40 -0400
In-Reply-To: <5193AA8E.2020109@kent.ac.uk> (David Chadwick's message of "Wed, 15 May 2013 16:32:30 +0100")
Message-ID: <tsl7gj0glvr.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: trust-router@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Trust-router] Considering delaying BOF Request
X-BeenThere: trust-router@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "ABFAB Trust Router discussion list." <trust-router.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trust-router>, <mailto:trust-router-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trust-router>
List-Post: <mailto:trust-router@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trust-router-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trust-router>, <mailto:trust-router-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 18:04:48 -0000

I think that trust router will work well for that use case.