Re: [Trust-router] Considering delaying BOF Request

Josh Howlett <Josh.Howlett@ja.net> Wed, 15 May 2013 20:27 UTC

Return-Path: <Josh.Howlett@ja.net>
X-Original-To: trust-router@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trust-router@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3469E21F86CE for <trust-router@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2013 13:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3aCMZYjkD8Rk for <trust-router@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2013 13:26:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from egw001.ukerna.ac.uk (egw001.ukerna.ac.uk [194.82.140.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A7B111E80E9 for <trust-router@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2013 13:26:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from egw001.ukerna.ac.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Email Security Appliance) with SMTP id 0C83125E7D45_193EF82B; Wed, 15 May 2013 20:26:42 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from EXC001.atlas.ukerna.ac.uk (exc001.atlas.ukerna.ac.uk [193.62.83.37]) by egw001.ukerna.ac.uk (Sophos Email Appliance) with ESMTP id D9CCF25E7D44_193EF81F; Wed, 15 May 2013 20:26:41 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from EXC001.atlas.ukerna.ac.uk ([193.62.83.37]) by EXC001 ([193.62.83.37]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Wed, 15 May 2013 21:26:41 +0100
From: Josh Howlett <Josh.Howlett@ja.net>
To: David Chadwick <d.w.chadwick@kent.ac.uk>
Thread-Topic: [Trust-router] Considering delaying BOF Request
Thread-Index: AQHOUX4T4oIU/b8QxUeVqzFvw/cN/pkGTxIAgAA7ebmAACdugA==
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 20:26:40 +0000
Message-ID: <CDB9A75E.22F2F%josh.howlett@ja.net>
In-Reply-To: <tsl7gj0glvr.fsf@mit.edu>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.4.130416
x-originating-ip: [194.82.140.76]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <9586A46E75F2FF46B6D491DDB9410B9A@ukerna.ac.uk>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "trust-router@ietf.org" <trust-router@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Trust-router] Considering delaying BOF Request
X-BeenThere: trust-router@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "ABFAB Trust Router discussion list." <trust-router.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trust-router>, <mailto:trust-router-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trust-router>
List-Post: <mailto:trust-router@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trust-router-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trust-router>, <mailto:trust-router-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 20:27:02 -0000

Hi David,

Sam writes that

>I think that trust router will work well for that use case.

When we talk about Trust Router, we often get push-back along the lines of
"that's a valid use case, but technology Foo already supports that".

This is often true if you're willing to apply technology Foo in a
non-typical fashion. So you could, for example, employ X509 in ways that
mimic Trust Router's CoIs. These may not be particularly practical, but
nonetheless it could in principle be done.

So -- playing Devil's Advocate -- could I ask why you are interested in
Trust Router as opposed to some other trust technology?

Josh.


Janet(UK) is a trading name of Jisc Collections and Janet Limited, a 
not-for-profit company which is registered in England under No. 2881024 
and whose Registered Office is at Lumen House, Library Avenue,
Harwell Oxford, Didcot, Oxfordshire. OX11 0SG. VAT No. 614944238