E-mail comment on a comment Colin Perkins made about Network Tokens in today's TSVAREA session

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 29 July 2020 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsv-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsv-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 553893A0DF4 for <tsv-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 11:14:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oUZtXHC5EyLJ for <tsv-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 11:14:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x232.google.com (mail-lj1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 478193A0DE7 for <tsv-area@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 11:14:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x232.google.com with SMTP id t6so13143267ljk.9 for <tsv-area@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 11:14:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=eaLLcGTp3UvsZSchmLL5AyOaXdzVgV7/ImluAzPvQEk=; b=u2taESE0ToPbHx332QTnZYn24fuHD0RIiDV1g4aP0qqEC123foZ0bQyvNjgS7LYMFE HylJwhybogbts78nIAg4EKfUruzSqD2SQdxp9g3yi7vziai7TfRfGaLTtdh2Db0GE9c8 rC/sJT2XPwp9BdZS62PwCJN05mFhpZRah867nJeifNgLICiMqsAf4Jk3f5RdM6g/Oai/ KcZRINKKpmuMFg9hVirCT4pqPzmDnA+aWQZXVZWCcv5aEnIk4MU3C6bIc1HsCexxkAJe pWW/dmBiMRoy0XVBfy+v8xzYtA6MtgV32uqng/vtnHyWdNKX1Cw0gsGDQxYCFCZzjTdf Jtuw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=eaLLcGTp3UvsZSchmLL5AyOaXdzVgV7/ImluAzPvQEk=; b=fs7wud1VBl62Dn/kVsG14UbX+WF1tChz40RCjRIVnRouSCsLlTjg2dPoZtsd8pAFKz 66vKxrGwLxLUBJLrYeN7TEHRVRc7mGiAxqZoJdB9TeC3VAwi4JbUMMLPeIjccZcDtbUt fM0k3V1EdENAohhXcf1bWeWikILL9ljoYzpp/OTauI/I2AkQpBU+bKoIOp+56i8fhz3c n9OoPSChUuhNDnf5E2qnPp7LfyGagqIYkDcPGmDvGzDjUXB0beMjai18VSTBmFbOygx1 z/ouEPazKKSVDXX09T6I0JzpzMjq3UMDcRKB9tbwnw9zrmePMuE+0WyqV9q6sYonjxiS CThQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532STGMVyfCQLQcCUOxcOuoxefhfWJwzMbVnlk4l6LMR+DzU1JLY LV7f45tVEeOp6XJ9hJiGNWpW6h5T0CzWRhKRqTJbwJmD
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy3GAhdDYeoD8QoL9kvWcVO+diZsBI85T7OvXwahQatggFo80TZfs3czQyiPVtyCvwVyNhdx6ptleQRlWhhogI=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9d86:: with SMTP id c6mr14987335ljj.418.1596046460317; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 11:14:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 13:13:54 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-fWmGYK+bAwQVP_-o=_KvWMabbcrtk8B41ytSiyynjH5w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: E-mail comment on a comment Colin Perkins made about Network Tokens in today's TSVAREA session
To: "tsv-area@ietf.org >> tsv-area@ietf.org" <tsv-area@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004ff59f05ab9886ff"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-area/NLfO5CPuNfxvagE6CMyldoEhsHs>
X-BeenThere: tsv-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Transport and Services Area Mailing List <tsv-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsv-area>, <mailto:tsv-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsv-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsv-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsv-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-area>, <mailto:tsv-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 18:14:24 -0000

The draft minutes from  https://codimd.ietf.org/notes-ietf-108-tsvarea say

"Colin: There’s a long history of this, to Brian and Jana’s points. One
outcome of SPUD and PLUS was that we believed we didn’t know how to solve
this well, and we started the Path Aware Networking Research Group. We
looked at what didn’t work before. Please look at that, and engage there."


At the risk of immodesty, I'd suggest starting with
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-panrg-what-not-to-do/, which
talks specifically about obstacles to deployment for "Path-Awareness",
including end systems not trusting networks and networks not trusting end
systems.

(I'm the editor, but it IS a research group draft)

Best,

Spencer