New Version Notification for draft-scheffenegger-congress-rfc5033bis-00.txt

["Scheffenegger, Richard" <[e-mail]>]

Hello,

In order to facilitate the github based editorial process of a revised
RFC5033 document that outlines the current best practises when it comes
to designing new congestion control mechanisms, I want to invite
everyone who has commented across various lists and in meetings, to
raise issues and contribute text here:


https://rscheff.github.io/rfc5033bis

https://github.com/rscheff/rfc5033bis/issues


As the home for this work has not yet fully formed yet, I created this
as an individual draft. There are no text changes in rfc50333bis-00
compared to rfc5033, only minor editorial changes due to the use of
markdown for the body of the document.

A number of individuals have already expressed their interest in
contributing improvements to this document. I am looking forward to
those contributions - either as issues and discussion points, or as
concrete text snippets - in order to reflect the current best
understanding of the congestion control environment.


A new version of I-D, draft-scheffenegger-congress-rfc5033bis-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Richard Scheffenegger and posted to
the IETF repository.

Name:           draft-scheffenegger-congress-rfc5033bis
Revision:       00
Title:          Specifying New Congestion Control Algorithms
Document date:  2023-02-17
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          11
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-scheffenegger-congress-rfc5033bis-00.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-scheffenegger-congress-rfc5033bis/
Html:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-scheffenegger-congress-rfc5033bis-00.html
Htmlized:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-scheffenegger-congress-rfc5033bis


Abstract:
    The IETF's standard congestion control schemes have been widely shown
    to be inadequate for various environments (e.g., high-speed
    networks).  Recent research has yielded many alternate congestion
    control schemes that significantly differ from the IETF's congestion
    control principles.  Using these new congestion control schemes in
    the global Internet has possible ramifications to both the traffic
    using the new congestion control and to traffic using the currently
    standardized congestion control.  Therefore, the IETF must proceed
    with caution when dealing with alternate congestion control
    proposals.  The goal of this document is to provide guidance for
    considering alternate congestion control algorithms within the IETF.




The IETF Secretariat