RE: Announcing the TSVAREA session on "Evolution of IETF Transport Protocols" @ IETF-88

[Linda Dunbar <[e-mail]>]

Martin and Spencer, 

Possible to include HTTP? More and more applications run HTTP, and many people believe that HTTP is the future of the transport protocol(s). 

Linda

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On
> Behalf Of Martin Stiemerling
> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 2:13 AM
> To: [e-mail]
> Subject: Announcing the TSVAREA session on "Evolution of IETF Transport
> Protocols" @ IETF-88
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> We would like to give time to the Transport Area to discuss any
> potential need to evolve the IETF transport protocols.
> 
> There are a number of proposals discussed in the IETF and outside of
> the
> IETF on changing parts of TCP (e.g. laminar TCP [1]), reusing parts of
> TCP (e.g., TCP Minion [2]), completely new transport protocols (e.g.
> QUIC [3]), and also discussions about the congestion control approach
> to
> be used (e.g., delay-based [4], LEDBAT [5]).
> 
> (We are fully aware that this list of proposals is incomplete)
> 
> Spencer and I are planning a slot in the TSVAREA session at IETF 88 in
> Vancouver to discuss this topic.
> 
> More information to come soon.
> 
> Let Spencer and me know at [e-mail] if you are interested
> in contributing actively to the session.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>    Spencer and Martin, your TSV ADs.
> 
> References
> [1] https://developers.google.com/speed/protocols/tcp-laminar
> [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-iyengar-minion-concept
> [3]
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RNHkx_VvKWyWg6Lr8SZ-saqsQx7rFV-
> ev2jRFUoVD34/edit?pli=1
> [4] https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/rmcat/charter/
> [5] https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/ledbat/charter/