Re: [Tsv-art] [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-19

Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Mon, 09 November 2020 21:52 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CCFD3A1326; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 13:52:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.318
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.318 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vsHWi-sXKln1; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 13:52:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from server217-4.web-hosting.com (server217-4.web-hosting.com [198.54.116.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 652623A12F7; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 13:52:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=HUUFSl+59Fc56nYAr4jTITrV2NDWLYNrrA9SqgcZ0rA=; b=JRQG1FGRK5xcLPLmuZ5oOvkt4 3dYL+qSzQ52bGZs1mIzuDBonv+tJe6iJf3P0Hi9tSaj7eXdyhGbCeN8m3C6sivBEo4md6aTYjik1X TbwuGbTHD5hD6mZzc/6b9pzyRDjAlQoNJLym17hNGFMl4HWqpIYQUlsFipVNl/ZO7ouStZSVKyl8I MNIal8nSQ0oK87LFimEIlBJMbLAuyNAGMzI5vKKuAkgLi7z4NXQFDIA4pTx9SeLaQ/kcAA69M3+03 8Sal9peBscj5TBnkoqxP3fSeB8vroouoRqj+eQjAWrZ/RkTrzbkTmaucsVLVTtrjRINiyZiUH+eKk +NEcug1kw==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-225-198.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.225.198]:56380 helo=[192.168.1.14]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1kcF4u-001W5n-Cc; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 16:52:02 -0500
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5CB40B3E-70D3-495E-806A-5D0971412795"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <007f01d6b6df$09da44f0$1d8eced0$@ndzh.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 13:51:55 -0800
Cc: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>, tsv-art <tsv-art@ietf.org>, idr@ietf.org, draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps.all@ietf.org, Last Call <last-call@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <E3F01682-7CFE-4575-89B6-BA8FA91C5879@strayalpha.com>
References: <160136116174.16215.18136914391238102648@ietfa.amsl.com> <F0D71821-50F8-4832-8997-904097383B68@strayalpha.com> <007f01d6b6df$09da44f0$1d8eced0$@ndzh.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/-vJVcXvMQHjbEeGeyqg36053pCg>
Subject: Re: [Tsv-art] [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-19
X-BeenThere: tsv-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Review Team <tsv-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsv-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsv-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 21:52:05 -0000

Hi, Sue,

I have a couple of other drafts currently being wrapped up (UDP options, TCP control block sharing bis). The tunnels is next on my list and I hope to finalize a version that we can consider for WGLC by the end of the year.

That doc (even the latest expired version) has the text we’ve recommended elsewhere, e.g., in the TCP core (793) and elsewhere. 

Joe

> On Nov 9, 2020, at 1:26 PM, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:
> 
> Joe and Brian: 
>  
> As the replacement shepherd for draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-19.txt,  I am looking for the INT area statement on tunnels and MTU in tunnels. 
>  
> Your intarea draft seems to have expired without any replacement. 
>  
> Where is the latest set of comments on tunnels and MTU issue from INT area? 
>  
> Sue 
>  
> From: Joseph Touch [mailto:touch@strayalpha.com <mailto:touch@strayalpha.com>] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 9:12 PM
> To: Brian Trammell
> Cc: tsv-art; Last Call; draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps.all@ietf.org <mailto:draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps.all@ietf.org>; idr@ietf.org <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-19
>  
>  
> 
> 
> On Sep 28, 2020, at 11:32 PM, Brian Trammell via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org <mailto:noreply@ietf.org>> wrote:
>  
> First and foremost, I was surprised to find no reference to tunnel or MTU 
> anywhere in the document, especially given the guidance in section 6 to
> stack tunnels. MTU issues are operationally difficulty in single-tunnel
> environments and become more likely to cause problems in multiple-tunnel
> environments. 
>  
> +1
>  
> This is discussed in detail, with some much more specific terminology, in draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels
>  
> In particular, *path MTU* is different from the received MTU, etc. It’s important to get this correct (note the many examples of current standards that do not).
>  
> Joe
> _______________________________________________
> Tsv-art mailing list
> Tsv-art@ietf.org <mailto:Tsv-art@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art>