[Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment-06

Yoshifumi Nishida via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 01 July 2019 07:44 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tsv-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CF3912002E; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 00:44:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Yoshifumi Nishida via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: tsv-art@ietf.org
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment.all@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.98.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <156196706639.5822.4976381308809192758@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2019 00:44:26 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/0JwxdKhUZOP-xGQrqS7EDCi0FQ0>
Subject: [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment-06
X-BeenThere: tsv-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Transport Area Review Team <tsv-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsv-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsv-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2019 07:44:27 -0000

Reviewer: Yoshifumi Nishida
Review result: Ready

This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's
ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's
authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF
discussion list for information.

When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this
review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC
tsv-art@ietf.org if you reply to or forward this review.

Summary: Ready

This document is a complementary doc for RFC7269 and transport related issues
are already addressed in RFC7269. I don't see new issues will be introduced in
the scenarios described in this doc.

Thanks,
--
Yoshi