[Tsv-art] Tsvart telechat review of draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-05

Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Mon, 11 June 2018 12:49 UTC

Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: tsv-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C77E3130FDB; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 05:49:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
To: <tsv-art@ietf.org>
Cc: dns-privacy@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy.all@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.81.2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152872139673.2788.1460798724788814704@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 05:49:56 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/39RYhiRJYY4Sdx_hh-EyzUXRiYE>
Subject: [Tsv-art] Tsvart telechat review of draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-05
X-BeenThere: tsv-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
List-Id: Transport Area Review Team <tsv-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsv-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsv-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 12:49:57 -0000

Reviewer: Magnus Westerlund
Review result: Ready with Nits

This is a follow up to the previous review:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-04-tsvart-lc-westerlund-2018-04-04/

Thanks for resolving the previously raised issues.

I did notice in Section 4.1 that the following paragraph:

   The Block Size will interact with the MTU size.  Especially for
   length values that are a large fraction of the MTU, unless the block
   length is chosen so that a multiple just fits into the MTU, Block
   Length Padding may cause unneccessary fragmentation for UDP based
   delivery.  Also, chosing a block length larger than the MTU of course
   forces to always fragment.

Is repeated with just one paragraph between them.