[Tsv-art] Antw: [EXT] [Ntp] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps-08
Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> Tue, 03 March 2020 07:09 UTC
Return-Path: <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
X-Original-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE863A19E7; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 23:09:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nt83kNjsIM3E; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 23:09:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx3.uni-regensburg.de (mx3.uni-regensburg.de [IPv6:2001:638:a05:137:165:0:4:4e79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14DA13A0D5A; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 23:09:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx3.uni-regensburg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 722976000050; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 08:09:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: from gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de (gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de [132.199.5.51]) by mx3.uni-regensburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A395600004D; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 08:09:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from uni-regensburg-smtp1-MTA by gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 08:09:33 +0100
Message-Id: <5E5E02AC020000A100037808@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 18.2.0
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 08:09:32 +0100
From: Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
To: ianswett@google.com, tsv-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>
References: <25708_1583167660_5E5D38AC_25708_855_1_158316762892.27374.16780761185123723332@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <25708_1583167660_5E5D38AC_25708_855_1_158316762892.27374.16780761185123723332@ietfa.amsl.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/3MmT78LmhdYkIY7tkcpDhj-qdVo>
Subject: [Tsv-art] Antw: [EXT] [Ntp] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps-08
X-BeenThere: tsv-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Review Team <tsv-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsv-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsv-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 07:09:43 -0000
>>> Ian Swett via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> schrieb am 02.03.2020 um 17:47 in Nachricht <25708_1583167660_5E5D38AC_25708_855_1_158316762892.27374.16780761185123723332@i tfa.amsl.com>: [...] > Section 9, Security Considerations > > The sentence beginning with "Timestamps can be spoofed or modified..." > implies What about a simple "could" instead of "can"? Actually I see no problem with the original sentence as long it doesn't read "Timestamps are spoofed and modified..." [...] Regards, Ulrich