Re: [Tsv-art] [art] Tsvart last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis-02

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Tue, 03 December 2019 04:48 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6896120114; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 20:48:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=fY7YC6uq; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=qFIX+Rgz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7_PILqfjs9UT; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 20:48:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88F381200C1; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 20:48:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644C9CF7; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 23:48:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 02 Dec 2019 23:48:30 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm1; bh=d VxwqTy9VACieusLf5QD6wAntzC2wZFFjKzIrThTW0M=; b=fY7YC6uqVjFUSIFgB vbFnBxE1H2YztktSr2JidNz+6mUDiqBtjlJD4kdOYlQmgyO0KIgy7cdd9140O1Rj dhNlmtlffwJx6N3Rp76gEwNInL46sV9JAh/Q1q7/7ySlDU+8o18H/xoU+GY+LQxc iygHxe3XHrupeyPSKxmafHry4fdMpCdqmTizUUAFcY5oFnMjFXYZpMKdevPkrZiQ h/Tx8ClwcE6b7peVh2CUxPU3gqdVhUlvO62/zbixqKkZrZagHk1o6r49YaTRHqS/ mxswyIBTd2e+cpcuv8GEB8NY5nhtR4fmJRwhwn7c7AqKXxdYiEB8PeVRwTLpbl7E letGw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=dVxwqTy9VACieusLf5QD6wAntzC2wZFFjKzIrThTW 0M=; b=qFIX+Rgz4B9egUoLATqXUCvhh7SQgSojtS7NADz2MPPPb4v8tgqcBAbxB JWRKz9Akval1igPTuHM0bWPr6iflu40zycp7hc2Ye+Odhotj0loEG4WmpYqLnX03 3PlpDJv98S1hLKEdXZPBhX3Szai76H0/LBE8lZ9z4deTDfZluoIpzgrIwtuWMrTl 4eTj6gGro9XTDLXvX3f5LNc8IFQ70DnVqKfzI23Xdw/RIeKVQ2E56sETxaaUdjaE GyqCmcsx+dMUXcL/6ablKMplQQl0HdIdE0T+Fcj9+A/luh8X9yRaAzkZ13Bn7U+I LHn5UAcZwdYE9hEtSXO5Af1nx/4Mw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:G-nlXRRnnGIh-8eJS0CGwMKUqlNo3eOTAxi-5iyeUy6Spsk4T6NvNA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrudejiedgjeefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesthhqmhdthhdtvdenucfhrhhomhepofgrrhhk ucfpohhtthhinhhghhgrmhcuoehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucffohhmrghinh epihgvthhfrdhorhhgpdhmnhhothdrnhgvthenucfkphepudduledrudejrdduheekrddv hedunecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtnecuve hluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:G-nlXRpXBUrTCeYTn3qnrhfGaNYDlA9aZXIEUWJ7sW0EUxbmy82eNw> <xmx:G-nlXTzzEDPOdMwrce60A3Zg6SzBuwrjXHVDDfkyhwgv6t-lN9tItA> <xmx:G-nlXWKC4qn-OAv7LxZFX5zxDS71KR5HMZUbgAsPlKvKav15_y_o9w> <xmx:HunlXTYh24JO9KqUSs-o3y_1dRcA4bIVcbxqBCg-zbUvfJcxweyZ5A>
Received: from attitudadjuster.mnot.net (unknown [119.17.158.251]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id AA3B230602EE; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 23:48:25 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3601.0.10\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <3C9D3507-D1F6-47F3-A7C4-1FB97948A1EC@strayalpha.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 15:48:21 +1100
Cc: tsv-art <tsv-art@ietf.org>, draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, Heather Flanagan <rse@rfc-editor.org>, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <005E6429-CBF4-4571-B78B-0AD4406DB657@mnot.net>
References: <157529896073.4145.17979625332817412068@ietfa.amsl.com> <0954C977-09E9-4038-B1F5-BFC36AE72794@mnot.net> <3C9D3507-D1F6-47F3-A7C4-1FB97948A1EC@strayalpha.com>
To: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3601.0.10)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/DIYL19Rjb2LOiyJBn_raIhtYnCA>
Subject: Re: [Tsv-art] [art] Tsvart last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis-02
X-BeenThere: tsv-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Review Team <tsv-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsv-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsv-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2019 04:48:34 -0000

> On 3 Dec 2019, at 3:45 pm, Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi, Mark,
> 
>> On Dec 2, 2019, at 2:59 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> There is one significant issue related to this document that needs to be
>>> addressed before it can proceed. There is an outstanding errata from RFC7320
>>> that remains unresolved. The BCP index, markings in the datatracker for these
>>> RFCs, and citations in this document are not aligned; that should be corrected
>>> (in all three places) so the appropriate citation in this document does not
>>> further propagate the error.
>> 
>> Yes - caught earlier and already fixed in source.
> 
> That fixes one of the three issues; there are two others. Is anyone fixing those?
> 
> (i.e., the BCP index and RFC metadata do not agree with each other).

Good question; I'm not sure. I noticed it in <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/b43r1IdU7DYPFY8yKbq2kEHTn-0>, but haven't heard anything more; CC:ing Heather and Henrik for guidance.

Cheers,

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/