IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tsv-art] [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-rosen-rfcefdp-update-2026-01

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 09 February 2022 20:10 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B88C3A0BC4; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 12:10:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.812
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.812 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.714, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Di8HWtKI3q_3; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 12:10:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x436.google.com (mail-pf1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::436]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 411293A0BA4; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 12:10:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x436.google.com with SMTP id l19so435567pfu.2; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 12:10:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OA0BZbB1DvnL2HwbrJzSn7IGwImuCOIT30fnDoh1xkI=; b=esBwvqB8b5SZTskHPeRn3ebHpVxXPbUa4JlQ3/9LQVdtu55rGR2yvofBIdEdHp2Qkg +BlDo1E2spiJbQ8lKkqQpbYZzkejLQ1MkMxlPuGYuQ6aGIBZvQrDlrFdh+GhsymIbqYJ dZk1tP1BmTZUjBZyrbZPDxwIISlpORCZNnYBlt/ZTmmRCd48E4eyEc0on0qYXb/xD9sE Y2M2A8DGOlmjDl6XydBqQAhCl/bVaWrBeCQGqDL1LtEUztUWDqH55354tN/Bft4la8Ib AcTOMkjGQVRizY0Z1l/vPCori8SYeeQB64hQRba4SJUR1GGbzIOM4Hl6kiBzH4cgSKu2 B6QQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=OA0BZbB1DvnL2HwbrJzSn7IGwImuCOIT30fnDoh1xkI=; b=0xYSHIDk0kEU7udHmML/UgBbfHr75a0daYDLGXgOllmE4vM/wrw60e1CX8D5qc3jVX i6+LR8mNDqdHeVNBGyKNVV7IsbeIkGvLcExcUuFZB8SySyvziiLZy46NQgNQ5eMhsjFC a8d+55+AtkReXc56236FT64ayTC67qXM2OzHWjZcO08oOugKW47gsV0teGotQRAU5/wA rcqCJG+ys24Lbc6i8zkkTqXgtmXaYgh/dJGxC57bWtH9o8MCMEhGVBFVBHYcxYabTaD3 Ejc8PHZrwFqhkgFHWe4jq8tHnDg2M20sJo8aOdVWAGujgrIfG5zscDopspoTGc0P1ylb CG/Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531SV1MiG3NIKXSBgP6ViMPJuAh7AjstJ/+yPVXjKrEQfTNnlCq3 0nu5s2d8UONK8ZFn6RLWLMvoEFtMgPI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzy6B0hyQtZ3xgJLelZj5IeDJlO5wU2f+TA4V+l49W+ky+PQUk7JKSfg+vJbp4VM/+BSrAKkw==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:338e:: with SMTP id z136mr3263326pgz.510.1644437449010; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 12:10:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:1180:7001:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2406:e003:1180:7001:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y191sm20834381pfb.114.2022.02.09.12.10.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 09 Feb 2022 12:10:48 -0800 (PST)
To: Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net>
Cc: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>, tsv-art@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, draft-rosen-rfcefdp-update-2026.all@ietf.org, rfced-future@iab.org
References: <164442923749.24453.13117947281136337416@ietfa.amsl.com> <65ab4aea-e131-239e-b6af-68702f6f9741@gmail.com> <69A33080-4A61-4203-A084-1B86415DDC43@brianrosen.net>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20fc6931-6f9c-e344-8173-8da6ac6a84fe@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 09:10:43 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <69A33080-4A61-4203-A084-1B86415DDC43@brianrosen.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/HcHCHr0BbM3izdB1xspDEh3Y5qM>
Subject: Re: [Tsv-art] [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-rosen-rfcefdp-update-2026-01
X-BeenThere: tsv-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Review Team <tsv-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsv-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsv-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 20:10:53 -0000

The additional argument I was given was that it would automatically synchronize the documents in the RFC Editing process. But I too don't care that much.

Regards
    Brian Carpenter

On 10-Feb-22 09:00, Brian Rosen wrote:
> <adding rfced-future>
> I don’t care that much.  I will note that -rfced-model assumes that this change is made, without having any normative statements about the matter, and “justification” isn’t usually a reason for a normative reference, but I’ll make the change if others want me to.
> 
> Brian
> 
> 
>> On Feb 9, 2022, at 2:55 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 10-Feb-22 06:53, Bernard Aboba via Datatracker wrote:
>>> Reviewer: Bernard Aboba
>>> Review result: Almost Ready
>>> This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's
>>> ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
>>> primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's
>>> authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to 
the IETF
>>> discussion list for information.
>>> When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this
>>> review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC
>>> tsv-art@ietf.org if you reply to or forward this review.
>>> This document updates RFC 2026 so as to be compatible with the proposed
>>> RFC Editor Model v3.
>>> This document has no transport-related implications.
>>> NITs:
>>> "It no " -> "It is no"
>>> Given that  [I-D.iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model] provides the justification for the
>>> change to RFC 2026, it seems like it should be a normative rather than an
>>> informative reference.
>>
>> That would be a downref. However, we decided to do exactly what you suggest
>> in draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter.
>>
>>      Brian
>>
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email