Re: [Tsv-art] [OPSEC] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-06

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Wed, 05 December 2018 13:54 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2AA01277BB; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 05:54:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IanY2h_tsr6e; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 05:54:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DEFD1277C8; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 05:54:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Envelope-To: ietf@ietf.org
Received: from cupcake.local (089-101-195156.ntlworld.ie [89.101.195.156] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id wB5DsRLE054391 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 5 Dec 2018 13:54:27 GMT (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.ibn.ie: Host 089-101-195156.ntlworld.ie [89.101.195.156] (may be forged) claimed to be cupcake.local
To: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
Cc: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>, IETF-Discussion Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering.all@ietf.org, opsec@ietf.org, tsv-art@ietf.org
References: <977CA53D-7F72-4443-9DE2-F75F7A7C1569@strayalpha.com> <20181126175336.GW72840@Space.Net> <c959d8cb6f6a04a8da8318cfa89da341@strayalpha.com> <2425355d-e7cc-69dd-5b5d-78966056fea7@foobar.org> <C4D47788-0F3D-4512-A4E3-11F3E6EC230B@strayalpha.com> <8d3d3b05-ecc3-ad54-cb86-ffe6dc4b4f16@gmail.com> <C929A8B9-D65C-4EF7-9707-2238AE389BE3@strayalpha.com> <CAL9jLaY4h75KK4Bh-kZC6-5fJupaNdUfm1gK2Dg99jBntMCEyQ@mail.gmail.com> <C47149DC-CAF2-449F-8E18-A0572BBF4746@strayalpha.com> <CAL9jLaYfysKm7qrG=+jq7zV=5ODnSX-tAhBAiTU7SzYF-YmcGw@mail.gma il.com> <728C6048-896E-4B12-B80B-2091D7373D16@strayalpha.com> <CAL9jLaYHVdHr+rVoWeNtXTXgLxbTaX8V9gn3424tvsLW60Kvow@mail.gmail.com> <5E70C208-0B31-4333-BB8C-4D45E678E878@isc.org> <CAN-Dau0go6_Puf0A9e7KBpk0ApJBUvcxYtezxnwNc-8pKJ3PwQ@mail.gmail.com> <4D69FA8E-FB8A-4A16-9CA6-690D8AE33C9E@strayalpha.com> <9a613af3-c71e-1c30-d10a-f8a57aee3250@foobar.org> <8FE8712B-4CFC-450F-AEB8-A7CCD7D2F121@strayalpha.com>
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Message-ID: <a96a4567-4247-c4d5-9c65-43960e98d17c@foobar.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 13:54:26 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 PostboxApp/6.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8FE8712B-4CFC-450F-AEB8-A7CCD7D2F121@strayalpha.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/Sq1j0JGx9R-zmzE-K8RJFRE29ow>
Subject: Re: [Tsv-art] [OPSEC] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-06
X-BeenThere: tsv-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Review Team <tsv-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsv-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsv-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 13:54:34 -0000

Joe Touch wrote on 05/12/2018 13:12:
> The choices below don’t include declaring this a security risk and
> turning it off.
> 
> If you want to change the standard, do so. But this isn’t a step
> isn’t that direction. And the previous attempts only show why IPv6
> has adoption problems.
> 
> The standard can still be changed, but regardless, this simply is not
> a security issue and shouldn’t be sold as one.
If J Random Hacker in his mom's basement can launch an attack which 
takes down your network core because your management planes can't handle 
1Tbit, or more realistically 10gbit, of HBH packets, then that is 
categorically a network security issue, even if it is a secondary effect.

Nick