[Tsv-art] (no subject)

"C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com> Sat, 24 November 2018 20:09 UTC

Return-Path: <heard@pobox.com>
X-Original-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E69D8130F65; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 12:09:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=heard@pobox.com header.d=pobox.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zA73Gxb6iBAo; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 12:09:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (pb-smtp2.pobox.com [64.147.108.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A719D130E70; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 12:09:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C6212B47E; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 15:09:06 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=mime-version :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; s=sasl; bh=gdM vOBchSL3W6iIjhpNiFTfUKA8=; b=xEdcQxsYk73TZEhOnx7pQwyl2l9060IwTIV wgeSvJC7aYY48pJNodnxBpiINgUmIvoSUNtBR/Y2WdapunEFKe43QQ1/Te59RtzG RDPy7SKMshq64NKBK2l2bJbivI5aNevCSaDANHgFr95F7uv0PAi2jw2oRGPeEEeY Y4iCDWrE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=mime-version :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b= D28woXB5Nwbilg7/7YVciXGyrVLEpebF7LuUjwHh382kzIIOTgkzxRrRdfd7IdZ6 qTyGaZQ7DW4MmWWrQUn6WHyeMP3RPVL/uDYwD48+GS9n1ND/RVjzX7BvbThJg0iJ sbhOEU7s5f0mpvu8JEsnNHQpRuzNdxLC3u39RYIEYlE=
Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514D112B47A; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 15:09:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail-it1-f173.google.com (unknown [209.85.166.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF50212B476; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 15:09:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mail-it1-f173.google.com with SMTP id x124so20533164itd.1; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 12:09:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gIi3WX0FJjNtbI3s1yqOHSGnQtJTrWjpjTmotAhGPTGBCA1uzB2 a1C93A1tGMCfrqItvIKbZqMDrVBoIyM1MQFBpIo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5c6wslu/UJoGZguTWhz6g+PC5HMRa25KET0TLQegEqbe6tRW0pRvnhdqTrO/NJRNw3wzSJ1iXP9Q8SLC/6YfnQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:d84:: with SMTP id 126-v6mr18424418itx.163.1543090144236; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 12:09:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 12:08:52 -0800
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CACL_3VGBOP7YkVuuoE_kWebVMh73XFEGgO1HXZod_Dv1La4b3w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACL_3VGBOP7YkVuuoE_kWebVMh73XFEGgO1HXZod_Dv1La4b3w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Scharf <michael.scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
Cc: TSV-ART <tsv-art@ietf.org>, OPSEC <opsec@ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Pobox-Relay-ID: CAE14082-F024-11E8-AD61-BFB3E64BB12D-06080547!pb-smtp2.pobox.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/VGwGQ-coW3vM0UiOqvWxMIK1Ets>
Subject: [Tsv-art] (no subject)
X-BeenThere: tsv-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Review Team <tsv-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsv-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsv-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 20:09:11 -0000

> On Nov 23, 2018, at 11:53 AM, Michael Scharf wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Michael Scharf
> Review result: Ready
>
> This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's
> ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
> primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's
> authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF
> discussion list for information.
>
> When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this
> review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please
> always CC tsv-art at ietf.org if you reply to or forward this review.
>
> I have reviewed draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-06. There are no apparent
> transport issues. The proposed filtering could slow down the deployment of
> experimental protocols that use IPv6 options, but the tradeoffs are explained
> in the document.

Did you notice that Section 3.5.5 advises discarding IPv6 packets whose Next
Header value is unknown -- i.e., IPv6 packets with unknown EHs **or** unknown
transport protocols?  Even for an IPv6 core router in the open Internet?

If not, would that fact change your assessment of this document?

As I noted in my own last call comments, I think that a more nuanced approach
is called for (e.g., as set forth in Section 4.4.5 for unknown option values).

Mike Heard