Re: [Tsv-art] [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison-03.txt
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Tue, 05 April 2022 10:27 UTC
Return-Path: <prvs=1094617358=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBF4E3A1FF8; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 03:27:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.007
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.007 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RTH2nHVl5bbx; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 03:27:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:495::5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2783A2026; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 03:27:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1649154438; x=1649759238; i=jordi.palet@consulintel.es; q=dns/txt; h=User-Agent:Date: Subject:From:To:CC:Message-ID:Thread-Topic:References: In-Reply-To:Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; bh=DYLjnYYs/MZ0siOgHPFigla/g0owQ5WbmMpmu+iSIbQ=; b=wnfF8gozCeIzr xXi4oUy0VtXqdFLmVy/HWj2aoHcF2dRcPfpIHqLZAWe//P9nOtWLM9Zc9n5c+NwT GgQxwPbxSxW509b2SXwUlRGtF8u++dhTSMrKOzCVizQLmqhXb1YiZAnhN0yfbjue orMEtmys0sVTojC9+7CwR5dcPCEetw=
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Tue, 05 Apr 2022 12:27:18 +0200
Received: from [10.10.10.145] by mail.consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v16.5.2) with ESMTPA id md50000837540.msg; Tue, 05 Apr 2022 12:27:17 +0200
X-MDRemoteIP: 2001:470:1f09:495:99c9:f462:557b:2045
X-MDHelo: [10.10.10.145]
X-MDArrival-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 12:27:17 +0200
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Return-Path: prvs=1094617358=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.60.22022702
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 12:27:17 +0200
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
CC: ops-dir@ietf.org, tsv-art@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org, gen-art@ietf.org
Message-ID: <3AA6F7E2-3C79-4C6A-A2F1-83FED3EFC450@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison-03.txt
References: <164915364489.6833.1561854650298933331@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <164915364489.6833.1561854650298933331@ietfa.amsl.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/W_ie51dodtbXQWTfO6d0dB3Qg1M>
Subject: Re: [Tsv-art] [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison-03.txt
X-BeenThere: tsv-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Review Team <tsv-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsv-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsv-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 10:27:31 -0000
Hi all, I just submitted the new version of this document, which includes corrections to the nits suggested by the TSV, OPSDIR, Gen-ART and SECDIR reviews. Tks a lot for all the inputs! Corrected also a wrong reference to PCP with the correct one (RFC6887). Regards, Jordi @jordipalet El 5/4/22, 12:15, "v6ops-bounces@ietf.org en nombre de internet-drafts@ietf.org" <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org en nombre de internet-drafts@ietf.org> escribió: A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Operations WG of the IETF. Title : Pros and Cons of IPv6 Transition Technologies for IPv4aaS Authors : Gabor Lencse Jordi Palet Martinez Lee Howard Richard Patterson Ian Farrer Filename : draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison-03.txt Pages : 33 Date : 2022-04-05 Abstract: Several IPv6 transition technologies have been developed to provide customers with IPv4-as-a-Service (IPv4aaS) for ISPs with an IPv6-only access and/or core network. All these technologies have their advantages and disadvantages, and depending on existing topology, skills, strategy and other preferences, one of these technologies may be the most appropriate solution for a network operator. This document examines the five most prominent IPv4aaS technologies considering a number of different aspects to provide network operators with an easy to use reference to assist in selecting the technology that best suits their needs. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison/ There is also an htmlized version available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison-03 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison-03 Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list v6ops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
- Re: [Tsv-art] [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6op… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ