IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis-02

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Mon, 02 December 2019 22:59 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C93DA1200C4; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 14:59:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=iAvBiLwt; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=x2c9xChc
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S_xrhiEw_3AH; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 14:59:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29A401200A4; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 14:59:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 499C9F4C; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 17:59:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 02 Dec 2019 17:59:33 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm1; bh=f CxL63AmkB8x9B8BNuzhU2/fMxDdCAoeNFLv+mw2AiI=; b=iAvBiLwt9iO3Sabe1 +BYx521jVC7QXdJGbd/MCkYDpQLg3gFGYD9BcKu1fVG6lMM7owzQXGkLv05A3F/t RqiYSIGBFVeSikVd6buUPE2TwYJ+XEQhkhTfbvgK3Thj2G14LbMMpf1KE5l8AZ1Q 7l8NPYQofpCoJisZ+x8sc7mI9Wdz1qKc1UmJFzgpjDpf3syadzWjTRNhtseQm6ay yTNxiNOkL4cglVwwzTKvvU2hZ/P5DZYOVK9WdXzw0uRI/AlHxdFt41rpRlN2WQut h7msGJUbmEjL4RM9ThdPeTAd6QmRamcat/YB4gU8WOv1krKl/nuMo9fwCPZCm3zF s/Wog==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=fCxL63AmkB8x9B8BNuzhU2/fMxDdCAoeNFLv+mw2A iI=; b=x2c9xChc5vtra3DZbWzpAFTDNYcVnszwkK/LFCQi8tojQDeReC9wB92bp kyp99B5Ate74d4TGqxy0Q+hrnPKYenpxGBQ76fM/ecNploG64ZXEdS3/aZIahjHL n2WlFWn/iNQUeRLhYxkSDfYxuHlgwp2cfNxsGxdsuW2BAFxeUMmRkR9VniLWcyW+ YSBDCesJwYU+HzYRIO7dkt6UisQ2wtS+lWb5UkRixzIeNQ1/S9WBPNY3+kpuDNFL YvBQBVofV2BW6cuqdsN4UOPKoLJ/p5lK25XTnQrsZRg+/God7/i4dsbznyCBYzex fE6VOPw0goZyoDT8CxnpLt38lti6Q==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:U5flXW8U-WLmON7Z36cmsDPsNwJVkO1fvrtpfzVIuH_vEe5DThomjw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrudejiedgtdefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesthhqmhdthhdtvdenucfhrhhomhepofgrrhhk ucfpohhtthhinhhghhgrmhcuoehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucffohhmrghinh epmhhnohhtrdhnvghtnecukfhppeduudelrddujedrudehkedrvdehudenucfrrghrrghm pehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiii gvpedt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:U5flXddgj5qps__Ub_tiZtEGR8MzP4PZwHTZBn5-LV4qXKVYb1qgdw> <xmx:U5flXZ5icXJ5J_6WSIYSHW6RKqNLXj-CGFDgri9Y31sNBhizjKnP9Q> <xmx:U5flXZcGj9XbQLgvivfmdf-TNIie0vQG1CRkL6yxiDebZC0owlOwSA> <xmx:VJflXTe76dyIYTcJik774dv3CQW_GUPg9w2tjESTugVXy1IRdc16zg>
Received: from attitudadjuster.mnot.net (unknown [119.17.158.251]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EAF108005C; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 17:59:29 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3601.0.10\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <157529896073.4145.17979625332817412068@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2019 09:59:26 +1100
Cc: tsv-art@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis.all@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0954C977-09E9-4038-B1F5-BFC36AE72794@mnot.net>
References: <157529896073.4145.17979625332817412068@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3601.0.10)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/YkevE4lsAJMzbUXYPQ0xFNbtyfs>
Subject: Re: [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis-02
X-BeenThere: tsv-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Review Team <tsv-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsv-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsv-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 22:59:37 -0000

Hi Joe,

Thanks for the review. Responses below.

> On 3 Dec 2019, at 2:02 am, Joseph Touch via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Joseph Touch
> Review result: Ready with Issues
> 
> This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's
> ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
> primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's
> authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF
> discussion list for information.
> 
> When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this
> review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC
> tsv-art@ietf.org if you reply to or forward this review.
> 
> There are no transport issues in this document.
> 
> The document would benefit from an explanation as to the reason for the need
> for this revision and a summary of the differences with the version it
> replaces, even if only in an appendix.

I agree, will add one. 

> There is one significant issue related to this document that needs to be
> addressed before it can proceed. There is an outstanding errata from RFC7320
> that remains unresolved. The BCP index, markings in the datatracker for these
> RFCs, and citations in this document are not aligned; that should be corrected
> (in all three places) so the appropriate citation in this document does not
> further propagate the error.

Yes - caught earlier and already fixed in source.

Thanks again,

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email