Re: [Tsv-art] [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-19

Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Fri, 16 October 2020 01:12 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5E7E3A0D57; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 18:12:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.318
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.318 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dpdUu7MZwqmw; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 18:12:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-4.web-hosting.com (server217-4.web-hosting.com [198.54.116.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A23B53A0D56; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 18:12:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=FV+7AY9qf8AuWpJGQF+o0N6Y4ttn5bITffqMHTAZh7c=; b=21+w23s47qGFHIAZCL8GofBP+ HByx3NczzLYCx9hyecXde2yGKLFmrt+Yj+5f5X2eyIfWtcjjrqt2VnTdBdrXul4D5Bn7veGnBeukp kauBjQljJEcCbRMLE9T6RMSsrewOYkpDWRLeur++h0KqS+0F6p9oKSuyidk5vwJ5qofeWGvoaF+WE pv0u5Fi5X7Z0+tMg/CtuG7khssMlTXRenQWLM9etwF06eJaaMuvMnP91qmWZtwUF0qFPhR0jq4zGy DUMXwA8UmPawbBwT+rGXdb2qsDnx77776/WB+g/qqxC5x+ucSbJf7eMTitZINc/ACL13nBz75zjeQ OpJX0WcEg==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-225-198.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.225.198]:64981 helo=[192.168.1.14]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1kTEHt-001Y7x-7B; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 21:12:09 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F2BF5016-014F-4285-B0F8-DAB5EF4E85A1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
From: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <160136116174.16215.18136914391238102648@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 18:12:04 -0700
Cc: tsv-art <tsv-art@ietf.org>, Last Call <last-call@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps.all@ietf.org, idr@ietf.org
Message-Id: <F0D71821-50F8-4832-8997-904097383B68@strayalpha.com>
References: <160136116174.16215.18136914391238102648@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/e9N6EuUBK-nDDD7X-13Hld5abwE>
Subject: Re: [Tsv-art] [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-19
X-BeenThere: tsv-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Review Team <tsv-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsv-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsv-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 01:12:11 -0000


> On Sep 28, 2020, at 11:32 PM, Brian Trammell via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> First and foremost, I was surprised to find no reference to tunnel or MTU 
> anywhere in the document, especially given the guidance in section 6 to
> stack tunnels. MTU issues are operationally difficulty in single-tunnel
> environments and become more likely to cause problems in multiple-tunnel
> environments. 

+1

This is discussed in detail, with some much more specific terminology, in draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels

In particular, *path MTU* is different from the received MTU, etc. It’s important to get this correct (note the many examples of current standards that do not).

Joe