Re: [Tsv-art] Tsvart early review of draft-ietf-lsvr-l3dl-03

[Rob Austein <[e-mail]>]

On Wed, 06 May 2020 18:40:52 -0400, Randy Bush wrote:
> 
> > I also assume that the pseudo code on p.11 would benefit from a leader
> > '0' in 0xffffffff -> 0x0ffffffff, otherwise expansion to 64 bits might
> > fill the high order bits with '1's, which is clearly not intended.
> 
> ok, but what kinky compiler are you using?  :)
> 
>      result = (result >> 32) + (result & 0x0FFFFFFFF);
>      result = (result >> 32) + (result & 0x0FFFFFFFF);

Last I checked, the pedantic C syntax would be 0xFFFFFFFFU.
But pseudo-code means whatever we define it to mean :)