Re: [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-06

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sat, 24 November 2018 20:22 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905AB130E70; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 12:22:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FxjKVT3kJaxT; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 12:21:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x535.google.com (mail-pg1-x535.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::535]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AAC6130DEE; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 12:21:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x535.google.com with SMTP id 17so4388808pgg.1; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 12:21:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Zg6G9PK6R+s3aLo007rN67r6VI1U7RZ89NDdIEgvvwQ=; b=njVqQctto6HUegX2uj/6DO+swYmQLlJHd1F4h03XOlOjkBSRLiv87XmdmTT+qvTE9T GeKxDJyQDXfogqO0Ldmz0tN6A85PdXzi8iw1hlLs2s9x0SiVC/0FbecSe9ct8wVjAey7 IVDSDPpFc4MpB/W3BakNqIo5TcZKQ7rIAJfytA+y5rs7R+vtX7BqkvmO8zMVD+/8gM7g S46auU8A3KxGzY0/MNInnK3lbDunuWU5di4ZfPUd8QGLQAPChM3d04hktgwL2clgWuzO SOKnr1U1S8sbBU0tfaRO4ikxk0FjgRJ3G6S5VZ3IEh55haOfbVRL2iaMrjJ7H0Xuf/bq w8uw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Zg6G9PK6R+s3aLo007rN67r6VI1U7RZ89NDdIEgvvwQ=; b=BzU7AZwxptpneibgEH+Lr1ykSb1BY+jKnIhEK/b8VLyk5V2o44wPQCmTMyo/achjkO mmX8GOJ9Rd6dr3wB2tJ/Q9kYmvUN26EQpsPfEgjincsWhTEmBjjTaWuXUoVcfJkL+pIb UqbJjwzVZ+5x/9bQL5nnMj70ImL/rsL/lT67nshstOFcTI8UYFxD/PBBbz5e/S+pjhUq A5+Y4YqbVVsKc0eG3d4DRHV8rLlus84GGIyy8r2wv05z92n5crMkXQFElhJT/vEavUm9 cbAvjRVDPfm7gGw4xqiVFJTiRt00Fl0Lei1utFqTRnfDV1fWxba4cFgqrgErIFChpQgV O5cg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJJQMQb8ceFFOB70PX32HbJZ2vo0vtEEcTIA1Pb/Cue5cmLR94X tlNnNZ5IKQudushlEfpiZCsrrQaZ
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fmDMy1EohCKE8DfKfUakpcDxDm+iInUDU/+aHU1hX9jLnK8n2GyiE5xu1bI5UgbWESCyU3Pg==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:e044:: with SMTP id f65mr21135795pfh.208.1543090918944; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 12:21:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] ([118.148.76.40]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v89sm35437536pfk.12.2018.11.24.12.21.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 24 Nov 2018 12:21:58 -0800 (PST)
To: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>, Michael Scharf <michael.scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
Cc: tsv-art@ietf.org, opsec@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering.all@ietf.org
References: <154300282321.9639.11604402305352742547@ietfa.amsl.com> <C4886ABA-3BBE-46AE-B2D9-9A6836D7A8BB@strayalpha.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <2c28d4ac-87de-bcaf-54e8-4e745235c800@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 09:21:52 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <C4886ABA-3BBE-46AE-B2D9-9A6836D7A8BB@strayalpha.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/z5AVKvttlBfmF8FsuVDm3cUGTMs>
Subject: Re: [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-06
X-BeenThere: tsv-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Review Team <tsv-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsv-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsv-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 20:22:02 -0000

On 2018-11-25 06:04, Joe Touch wrote:
> Equally worrisome that this doc appears to make recommendations that imply BCP, when it is merely informational.
> 
> IMO, it’s overstepping to do so.

Possibly, but it's not forbidden by rule, as far as I know. However, the
draft is inconsistent in its use of SHOULD vs should (see my previous
message for an example of a lower case should which might or might not
be intended pseudo-normatively).

    Brian
> 
> Joe
> 
>> On Nov 23, 2018, at 11:53 AM, Michael Scharf <michael.scharf@hs-esslingen.de> wrote:
>>
>> Reviewer: Michael Scharf
>> Review result: Ready
>>
>> This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's
>> ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
>> primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's
>> authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF
>> discussion list for information.
>>
>> When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this
>> review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please
>> always CC tsv-art@ietf.org if you reply to or forward this review.
>>
>> I have reviewed draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-06. There are no apparent
>> transport issues. The proposed filtering could slow down the deployment of
>> experimental protocols that use IPv6 options, but the tradeoffs are explained
>> in the document.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Michael
>>
> 
>