Re: [tsvwg] SCReAM (RFC8298) with CoDel-ECN and L4S

Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com> Tue, 10 March 2020 10:07 UTC

Return-Path: <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F40FB3A0B5E for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 03:07:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SzxAaT-bSdMo for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 03:07:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR02-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr10064.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.1.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B4CE3A0F91 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 03:07:40 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=a9Ytz4VMtOwuy8d+XCcuhx7G8ZfHUxPo+WKUry1guEBgXirK94h5ACJenQO8Pjj1RcA4mw9VCdjj0zTb7hgeWrf1lHUwTEqSz8lmeWoXskRIlSJ2wiPQD6Zhh2U0Hgcr0bbymeQz8TmcMuL9PSyH11KpeR/2Rg7rOlXOXrnCSh4yLBnbmCkfXFA82Df3ZTEa9DMpG2Hj5rpxPrFNkqnl/IFiW171uGb/sllQparcR2WD+jZq22SdoNYSH7vCJZy2TdI1kTSPpNMsd/SfiGEaF5tp1kuoxJ/xZHQmwobgRReqirwZbKMt2Es6y+rUivaX2I/WqE/eqLXH8eXRYmXpWw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;bh=dwcuuCWKVNeqRMT1yyEm78DnYFFfAtHhJk5Bo6VsoKU=; b=i1dm9IO/aNAx9Sr4dFlLJArv/mu+nHgdcN5iEX5OjMQxy0TEn7Qmmbzxe2nZDhq/EUTyIYxor7MbMbV080DQJynoxmusdXobdY73fhypS7q+Iz9j1BAbtx04L4iuaU5//Y7p4XVZFlIRB3lgMEv3VCvPpGzMqix5y4/EQ2c2CDd203hZVIzayebxQtwopnP+HCtBDjimzT+98oTUsMidc7QDhqTVo06cey+awP5FIv0ShAOKmFFHGZyi23iuOHJX2e3F3B8jXpjwiFOEGWv35MmuL4Mfn/klv9pS8EUhPVbAJxeEPliLeSFkSDNC4nA4dGe9e0Y+0xaC3EC3s+0Z+A==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ericsson.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=ericsson.com; dkim=pass header.d=ericsson.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericsson.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;bh=dwcuuCWKVNeqRMT1yyEm78DnYFFfAtHhJk5Bo6VsoKU=; b=MxwPIFDISZ+7Ypbbq+GYUvaJeed1CUcq7yXxsjYgZDyAss7n4xD6nA9bhWs6O4RgbaeadoJ57KSR4oyIlihNf7qX8+s+eXipbaMQIvjf+2x+riRDjBn9qn+B1KfNqdoD7BJSnFSyxMcKK2/ST3gFKPtOkeGLqvW9EtnHoOgm4Bk=
Received: from HE1PR07MB4425.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (20.176.162.29) by HE1PR07MB3337.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.170.244.140) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2814.11; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:07:36 +0000
Received: from HE1PR07MB4425.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e80a:dc35:1cef:7cb9]) by HE1PR07MB4425.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e80a:dc35:1cef:7cb9%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2814.007; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:07:36 +0000
From: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>, Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
CC: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>, "iccrg@irtf.org" <iccrg@irtf.org>, Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [tsvwg] SCReAM (RFC8298) with CoDel-ECN and L4S
Thread-Index: AdX2sUQTt8TR64exRw6bAaEpFrsNEgAD11cAAACWSIA=
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:07:36 +0000
Message-ID: <HE1PR07MB4425B105AFF56D1566164900C2FF0@HE1PR07MB4425.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <HE1PR07MB44251B019947CDB6602B30B2C2FF0@HE1PR07MB4425.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <A2300F8D-5F87-461E-AD94-8D7B22A6CDF3@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <A2300F8D-5F87-461E-AD94-8D7B22A6CDF3@gmx.de>
Accept-Language: sv-SE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com;
x-originating-ip: [192.176.1.80]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: ff340cb3-fb91-4013-c5a4-08d7c4dadbfc
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: HE1PR07MB3337:|HE1PR07MB3337:
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <HE1PR07MB33376A37C06A9F963616BC05C2FF0@HE1PR07MB3337.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:1060;
x-forefront-prvs: 033857D0BD
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6029001)(4636009)(376002)(366004)(136003)(396003)(39860400002)(346002)(189003)(199004)(66574012)(86362001)(107886003)(5660300002)(4326008)(186003)(9686003)(26005)(316002)(54906003)(55016002)(478600001)(71200400001)(8936002)(110136005)(64756008)(66446008)(53546011)(66476007)(66556008)(8676002)(966005)(66946007)(81156014)(66616009)(15974865002)(2906002)(81166006)(76116006)(52536014)(33656002)(6506007)(7696005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:HE1PR07MB3337; H:HE1PR07MB4425.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: ericsson.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: yJo998Tv4pywqtnI1hsSZ4StvOpT7KC2OH5Dj6uEF23uBtJmMJ5Q5DGFENi4qoAE2BJ4rAa9xXdqaR10PwBdtmonT1OLJsx+BW+Znf8FHYkXsVtld2swtkfzO84g8jCxKqhNLKgbP3zGyQ9eKM6ENQ==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg="SHA1"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0640_01D5F6CC.1A4505B0"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: ericsson.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: ff340cb3-fb91-4013-c5a4-08d7c4dadbfc
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 10 Mar 2020 10:07:36.6976 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: bgQZTfN3wgHHDjAFknYsFIvJ1C3+ez4f8ylCv7q4m4F5W+iZ2LlIFrmfzHP+bembZuCkptcJ2YfClBYpBrWtJOw8rGXAo0B0VIbgwcIxqKZ1lyzPMx1A6UFOX9n7Xtl0
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1PR07MB3337
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/ULc5Vd-tsqwiGCmBdRrMdi25FZQ>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] SCReAM (RFC8298) with CoDel-ECN and L4S
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:07:43 -0000

Hi

For the future studies we will only focus on L4S as the scope is to study the performance gain that L4S give for instance for AR/VR, gaming and remote control applications.
Flow aware AQMs with RTT estimates as metadata in the packets is outside the scope as it would require packet inspection, which is not feasible if queues build up on the RLC layer in the 3GPP stack.

/Ingemar

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
> Sent: den 10 mars 2020 10:45
> To: Ingemar Johansson S
> <ingemar.s.johansson=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> Cc: tsvwg@ietf.org; Ingemar Johansson S
> <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>; iccrg@irtf.org
> Subject: Re: [tsvwg] SCReAM (RFC8298) with CoDel-ECN and L4S
> 
> Hi Ingemar,
> 
> thanks for posting this interesting piece of data!
> 
> > On Mar 10, 2020, at 09:02, Ingemar Johansson S
> <ingemar.s.johansson=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I recently updated the readme on the SCReAM github with a comparison with
> SCReAM in three different settings
> > 	• No ECN
> > 	• CoDel ECN
> > 	• L4S
> > https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=63019d27-3f884737-6301ddbc-0cc47
> > ad93e2a-489fa99c3277fb8a&q=1&e=5aab95a7-4aab-4a64-99a5-
> 5b55606e303b&u=
> > https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FEricssonResearch%2Fscream%23ecn-explicit-
> co
> > ngestion-notification
> >
> > Even though it is more than a magnitude difference in queue delay
> > between CoDel-ECN and L4S,
> 
> 
> 	[SM] So, in this simulations of a 20ms path, SCReAM over L4S gives ~10
> times less queueing delay, but also only ~2 less bandwidth compared to SCReAM
> over codel. You describe this as "L4S reduces the delay considerably more" and
> "L4S gives a somewhat lower media rate". I wonder how many end-users would
> tradeoff these 25ms in queueing delay against the decrease in video quality from
> halving the bitrate?
> Could you repeat the Codel test with interval set to 20 and target to 1ms,
> please?
> 
> If that improves things considerably it would argue for embedding the current
> best RTT estimate into SCReAM packets, so an AQM could tailor its signaling
> better to individual flow properties (and yes, that will require a flow-aware
> AQM).
> 
> 
> 
> > it is fair to say that these simple simulations should of course be seen as just a
> snapshot.
> 
> 	[SM] Fair enough.
> 
> > We hope to present some more simulations with 5G access, and not just
> simple bottlenecks with one flow, after the summer.
> 
> 	[Looking] forward to that.
> 
> >
> > Meanwhile, the SCReAM code on github is freely available for anyone who
> wish to make more experiments.
> >
> > /Ingemar
> > ================================
> > Ingemar Johansson  M.Sc.
> > Master Researcher
> >
> > Ericsson Research
> > RESEARCHER
> > GFTL ER NAP NCM Netw Proto & E2E Perf
> > Labratoriegränd 11
> > 971 28, Luleå, Sweden
> > Phone +46-1071 43042
> > SMS/MMS +46-73 078 3289
> > ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com
> > www.ericsson.com
> >
> >   Reality, is the only thing… That’s real!
> >       James Halliday, Ready Player One
> > =================================