Re: [tsvwg] Comments on draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-06

"Gorry (erg)" <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Wed, 19 June 2019 18:23 UTC

Return-Path: <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D3E312083E; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 11:23:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s0XadDbOy0Rb; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 11:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:42:150::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5CB1208BF; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 11:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.3.96.114] (unknown [85.255.237.95]) by pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F27A1B0012D; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 19:22:58 +0100 (BST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: "Gorry (erg)" <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16D57)
In-Reply-To: <E702E8BC-1A6D-4671-87DE-3D1025CFAE64@csperkins.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 20:22:02 +0200
Cc: Thomas Fossati <Thomas.Fossati@arm.com>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DFB03E30-2094-4220-8B65-E525320AFF89@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
References: <E0BAA0EC-4D2D-4578-A2A1-45B3DA831911@arm.com> <98A10145-5020-4CCA-ABEB-72411A03A3B2@csperkins.org> <516741E1-9B3C-41EB-9C9F-6439237C0148@arm.com> <E702E8BC-1A6D-4671-87DE-3D1025CFAE64@csperkins.org>
To: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/-myGST0-UwR1P3Sj4KjuuEA2dtM>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Comments on draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-06
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 18:23:10 -0000

On 19 Jun 2019, at 19:56, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>; wrote:

>> On 18 Jun 2019, at 23:47, Thomas Fossati <Thomas.Fossati@arm.com>; wrote:
>> On 18/06/2019, 11:46, "Colin Perkins" <csp@csperkins.org>; wrote:
>>> As for the rest, I don’t disagree that machine learning will be
>>> important, but I’m not the right person to write about it. I’m also
>>> not clear where such material would fit in the document. It might be
>>> better to have a separate document, that this can maybe refer to, that
>>> starts to discuss solutions to the issues identified.
>> 
>> That might be a good plan.
>> 
>> Someone who could help with this is David Meyer, I guess.  He did a couple
>> of talks in Dallas (93) and Seoul (97) that give a very nice overview on
>> the topic.
> 
> 
> Agree he’d be a good person, if he’s interested in contributing.
> 
> -- 
> Colin Perkins
> https://csperkins.org/

Yes, fine with me too.

-  I think we need to be sure this is experience not research.

There are plenty of papers, proposals for new approaches, ioam proposals, etc, that go beyond the current use, and I think these aspirations can’t be in this ID.

Gorry