IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] CALL to revoke last call: Re: Request for working group feedback on draft-kuehlewind-system-ports (6th March, 2020)

Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Tue, 18 February 2020 04:37 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DF271200B2 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 20:37:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.219
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G45KQpu0vQiu for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 20:37:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E5CB120074 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 20:37:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Mime-Version: Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Rs+WQGMIeBsBHkbjl1ASny+tGEF15Pdissqa1hwhvz4=; b=AQzDC2HkXKFnkuUkyFOMpZhuF 54rr+TZnIGm9HbtoVkxq6xLfgcaIDSRT8Zuc9TTe0lL+dAM3GXcsrsl7wdq3xRG6AAUjoT21JDmz/ 1VrODaZDbk9LA9xCIRXWLgZ1eLbTlCbpTng7jfGYT9jf+3nhFaRLsUA/xYGxlWeFdwrxTaifLRvvX tNuzmHTWf2jjRUteAy2AVPgT4Te6YMIVD+UFVN953xfUDRp0yRnMYfUc36rDF1Dts/2vC9zk4RXsJ oH+os6Jf/s/6y04WZrQFimj+6mlHiCV6uY8eivoETdkEzmfpQqeaELaFjr2GjxrrbtA+RU1gy1JHt fqx/waasA==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-225-198.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.225.198]:49750 helo=[192.168.1.10]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1j3udl-000Dhp-KJ; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 23:37:50 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <91609d1b-b728-c694-9298-61d9d977b077@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 20:37:44 -0800
Cc: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7DE8E43A-0FC7-4E8E-B742-4C12BCE8C82A@strayalpha.com>
References: <3cdde689-7031-a1de-1d4e-16a86e40f35c@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <c432c59b-0df6-9ad1-177f-8de8e1d07119@strayalpha.com> <91609d1b-b728-c694-9298-61d9d977b077@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/-tDCAA3Qkn8YLkQPJfMX_6n8_QY>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] CALL to revoke last call: Re: Request for working group feedback on draft-kuehlewind-system-ports (6th March, 2020)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 04:37:53 -0000


> On Feb 17, 2020, at 8:20 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Joe,
> 
> On 18-Feb-20 12:06, Joe Touch wrote:
>> I object on process grounds at a minimum and call for its "last calls" 
>> to be revoked by the sponsoring AD and WG chair as follows:
>> 
>> 1) this doc went to "IETF last call" (according to the doc tracker) 
>> without ever being announced on the IETF-wide last call list
> 
> I don't understand what you think is wrong, procedurally.
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/C3YU0i15ZSTaYHPMKOe_8sGVmLk
> is a standard Last Call message, and it's a 4-week last call as required
> for non-WG documents. As far as I can tell that fully respects RFC2026 etc.

We have a Last Call mailing list. I searched there and found (and still find) nothing. What’s the point of the Last Call list then? 

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email