Re: [tsvwg] New Version Notification for draft-nagesh-sctp-auth-4895bis-00.txt
Nagesh shamnur <nagesh.shamnur@huawei.com> Mon, 04 November 2019 13:02 UTC
Return-Path: <nagesh.shamnur@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F316E1200FE for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 05:02:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wRfSA-w6SGJJ for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 05:02:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1DB41200FA for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 05:02:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 7F23430A3F9CD9CAC8F0 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 13:02:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from dggeme761-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.107) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 13:02:55 +0000
Received: from dggeme761-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.107) by dggeme761-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 21:02:52 +0800
Received: from dggeme761-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.66.35]) by dggeme761-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.66.35]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 21:02:52 +0800
From: Nagesh shamnur <nagesh.shamnur@huawei.com>
To: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
CC: Ashutosh prakash <ashutosh.prakash@huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-nagesh-sctp-auth-4895bis-00.txt
Thread-Index: AdVBH7McQ1uqpSX6QpeYIUyMN4NyTxR7/alQ
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 13:02:52 +0000
Message-ID: <8d7a543d6cd94e56b75fa0e7601b7e97@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.18.156.80]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8d7a543d6cd94e56b75fa0e7601b7e97huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/0oZPml5g7mTZMfsy5jTjCzznWn0>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] New Version Notification for draft-nagesh-sctp-auth-4895bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 13:03:00 -0000
Dear TSVWG members, With this draft I want to highlight one key issue with AUTH 4895 RFC which doesn’t address the scenario in which one of the communicating peer doesn’t support AUTH feature. Apart from this key issue to also addresses many other issues (both technical and editorial). I would like to present the same in upcoming IETF 106 Singapore meeting. Request members to review the same and provide me with your valuable comments. Regards, Nagesh S From: Nagesh shamnur Sent: 23 July 2019 11:58 To: 'tsvwg@ietf.org' <tsvwg@ietf.org> Cc: Ashutosh prakash <ashutosh.prakash@huawei.com> Subject: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nagesh-sctp-auth-4895bis-00.txt Dear Chairs & Members, As per the points which I had posted earlier on mailing list regarding the issues/enhancements that needs to be done to SCTP Auth RFC 4895, I have put across all of them in the draft and is available as per the announcement mail below. Request all to provide review and provide your valuable comments and feedback. Regards, Nagesh S ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org<mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>> Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 at 15:14 Subject: New Version Notification for draft-nagesh-sctp-auth-4895bis-00.txt To: Nagesh Shamnur <nagesh.shamnur@gmail.com<mailto:nagesh.shamnur@gmail.com>> A new version of I-D, draft-nagesh-sctp-auth-4895bis-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Nagesh Shamnur and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-nagesh-sctp-auth-4895bis Revision: 00 Title: Authenticated Chunks for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) bis Document date: 2019-07-21 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 20 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nagesh-sctp-auth-4895bis-00.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nagesh-sctp-auth-4895bis/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nagesh-sctp-auth-4895bis-00 Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-nagesh-sctp-auth-4895bis Abstract: This document obsoletes RFC4895 if approved. This document describes a new chunk type, several parameters, and procedures for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP). This new chunk type can be used to authenticate SCTP chunks by using shared keys between the sender and receiver. The new parameters are used to establish the shared keys. This document describes the limitations with the current SCTP AUTH RFC4895 and thus enhances the document to resolve such ambiguities and thus strengthen the overall AUTH procedure. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org<http://tools.ietf.org>. The IETF Secretariat
- [tsvwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-n… Nagesh shamnur
- Re: [tsvwg] New Version Notification for draft-na… Nagesh shamnur
- Re: [tsvwg] New Version Notification for draft-na… Maksim Proshin
- Re: [tsvwg] New Version Notification for draft-na… Nagesh shamnur
- Re: [tsvwg] New Version Notification for draft-na… Maksim Proshin