IETF Logo Mail Archive

[tsvwg] draft-tuexen-tsvwg-sctp-zero-checksum-02 adoption

Nils Ohlmeier <nils.ohlmeier@8x8.com> Tue, 11 April 2023 17:15 UTC

Return-Path: <nils.ohlmeier@8x8.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14B92C1522D9 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 10:15:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=8x8.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t4qGApd9oHRw for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 10:15:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd35.google.com (mail-io1-xd35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d35]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19468C152A28 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 10:15:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd35.google.com with SMTP id v126so4101636ioe.8 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 10:15:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=8x8.com; s=googlemail; t=1681233311; h=to:cc:date:message-id:subject:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Ibo5iX+FmcFNncCf9QlGhij7NTMa1C8742cC/OPBPm8=; b=OmSOuaOuigVlqPMmEAAtvZ46fWLbPfUkuDPYudJi1Wf5x5QfyBip6JTOEVIQpVerf5 /gboRilnYp5gyhw46cn9BbfQozfXZqzIMti4F4uM7vN2qT6yl+6mXbemCHenQpeaaO5o XW1Rg34UmynzjtRHinskBhFu2sEIjm011Kg90=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1681233311; h=to:cc:date:message-id:subject:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Ibo5iX+FmcFNncCf9QlGhij7NTMa1C8742cC/OPBPm8=; b=NhE9WOABFP/+lc9V5yWsv25Ma1sJ430yEDv5J7n1p/bMxne0Gtg31RZln3l/eR2ZTJ q95c0QM4vSAWkO4viA+Jn9L4eHKHF818p0a4x267Jx42Rie52OyE1M2DkIRLBebfWNaZ tgdRoe1Hph8+vtk5ps+iZWPa65rdXSdwRkfX7zyfa+p/Yh8aWG0cEGwPHeL6pdDiS2i9 GGv/JtbHs7HLmzFMNOeOZ4azQV0HYzns+kRIcMoOU22mBKuwbxJnPr/46Jjz3gVeJf0x NSIpKpZGsd5YGihj64LNjcojFvkikcVa+DHAmzGiYjI6DTUVZf0sNdirZGqcbGPvJKlA 9EWw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9f8eV7mV4j7S2T9YvfTtF4vLpmS02+Q7RjnO0DgUEsyG4MyquqR pL6Cu9mb4NkxoN8bC6IOn8tLZpZYXQi9fUDYXYo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350ZGvVAhTlzrbBsqXRGPKV2NFWzJKlvsoWmHBKGnmuRKDwcrATCpIlOYLEV1APhusqJ29KLcew==
X-Received: by 2002:a5e:d515:0:b0:760:8476:8717 with SMTP id e21-20020a5ed515000000b0076084768717mr3624755iom.0.1681233311452; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 10:15:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (75-166-40-160.hlrn.qwest.net. [75.166.40.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c44-20020a023f6c000000b003c4f35c21absm4067230jaf.137.2023.04.11.10.15.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Apr 2023 10:15:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Nils Ohlmeier <nils.ohlmeier@8x8.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.500.231\))
Message-Id: <9F7A670A-EA7E-4194-8125-B1DB7030802B@8x8.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 11:15:00 -0600
Cc: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.500.231)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/1C7snONOzGqIRk-iApPGBhUw_Nk>
Subject: [tsvwg] draft-tuexen-tsvwg-sctp-zero-checksum-02 adoption
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 17:15:17 -0000

Hello,

I’m supporting adoption of draft draft-tuexen-tsvwg-sctp-zero-checksum-02, because it is going to be useful for all WebRTC endpoints out there to have the option to skip the checksum step.

I also reviewed the draft. The only concern I found is this sentence:

"Since the lower layer of SCTP can not be IPv4 or IPv6 as specified in [RFC9260] or UDP as specified in [RFC6951], no problems with middle boxes expecting correct CRC32c checksums in the SCTP packets are expected.”

Which confuses me, because it sounds to me like this is trying to say that SCTP over IPv4 or IPv6 can not be done. Which obviously doesn’t make any sense. But I honestly fail to parse what this sentence is suppose to tell me (besides no problems with middle boxes is expected).

Best
  Nils Ohlmeier

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status