Re: Draft Review Request - IRTP IANA Considerations

["t.petch" <[e-mail]>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Touch" <[e-mail]>
To: "Mykyta Yevstifeyev" <[e-mail]>
Cc: <[e-mail]>; <[e-mail]>; <[e-mail]>;
<[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 6:56 AM
On Jan 4, 2011, at 9:26 PM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev <[e-mail]> wrote:

> 04.01.2011 13:00, Lars Eggert wrote:
>> On 2011-1-3, at 21:30, Joe Touch wrote:
>>> At this point, they might be better moved to historic than anything else.
There's no reason to have IANA track or manage their values.
>> As an individual WG participant, I fully agree with Joe.
> Lars
>
> As I have mentioned before, I can agree with this only for IRTP (and maybe for
RDP), but not NETBLT. I have recently made a draft moving IRTP to historic -
here is a link
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yevstifeyev-tsvwg-irtp-to-historic/
>
> Maybe there is no doubt that this protocol should be Historic - so could you
please sponsor the publication of this document as RFC?

There us also neither a need nor a utility. Is there some other reason you ate
trying so hard to get an RFC published?

Joe

You may have seen
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg65008.html
if not I suggest you take a look and respond.  It is a forward of
an IESG message for a Last Call.

Tom Petch




Joe=