IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] [Ecn-sane] is FQ actually widely deployed?

Pete Heist <pete@heistp.net> Mon, 22 July 2019 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <pete@heistp.net>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 573D81200E3 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 11:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=heistp.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ENJO1EC-J2hR for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 11:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x944.google.com (mail-ua1-x944.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::944]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07A9C120020 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 11:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x944.google.com with SMTP id 8so15720361uaz.11 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 11:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heistp.net; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=erhclM+IePM0iApJXpacaB+i8zDiE4d/BM88mB8CEnc=; b=eCWokX56+Sbja4aW4TooWGL2sevozC8LygDbNSggLIkgvwfl72842Miee+114NeBJo NvG9kuuqCvaZua26ZR7B8oTrnDTIffhCGlYDD24/jzWjbHbTynQCIxfj1xGgAq3HuZ8j R9SyVbhKe52+9cXVV0K7UEVcBSs20gwQ9NZZL5eA2rqDbUf17hBfbPrzKqp/UwMRfrRv BMqKQtNlCXWWUHt+RUjWWzJnss7FAq+J6H7BYD7Y8/9NjX3TDjIsvZlIyPuRyBg7aRN7 qGeXjepKYXLNdwjjeGK9D9NgMDQgtb5yD2oPiV0PsaphtWRaF3XUMLzqSTm6jF++sXPs TRaA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=erhclM+IePM0iApJXpacaB+i8zDiE4d/BM88mB8CEnc=; b=BIlgTbLoMwuGSfcLPMpyPAha+uIpX41PWnQyn7WzY6Tf5EAdlG3+rywPh1Z4GM+xDW rhanh3eB+nY081WYCreQZ09QRnPn/YswXdRQqNQpJAmK9S40TDfl3uRA/q2d/BLnBPeP jx2uiE48DlvGtAARbsoJGFF1STj7kbIoTpNd/zlUXq7dT01szlAsFHkT+sjjHJAAnsNC qdtLJta98/tYmJJTYte7pf7xyNgFeONK3bjbstzwKgnVkQQM0Hj3MP+R8eRvob6+dumk E5iNcu03N4ZoAXa239Xe3cdIhalP6Pr15Q/ObW83i3x+ZD4YGFpt4DUw/3Njd+ytsQgV KHBA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUxBEhPihX7tAb/kdGECyjjJLoLy6MCrDq+pzUkLq+58OaJRT2B yjdorEwa6Y2PrPVjWAGvU0tShw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxBxzGaTCjNgmFM5Gc9HpKPy/m/iLgCjokwNtbSMLJUmUYbvmUlEy0bpL3E7jeZPga8NeDqgg==
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:6390:: with SMTP id y16mr43526445uao.62.1563818522698; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 11:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from yoda-3.lan (173-246-8-242.qc.cable.ebox.net. [173.246.8.242]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 10sm15156572vkl.33.2019.07.22.11.02.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 22 Jul 2019 11:02:01 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Pete Heist <pete@heistp.net>
In-Reply-To: <87sgqy3sqh.fsf@toke.dk>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 14:02:00 -0400
Cc: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>, Jonathan Foulkes <jfoulkes@evenroute.com>, "ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net" <ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>, Dave Taht <dave@taht.net>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E715CEEC-EF5C-4E1C-933E-F3B462B332A1@heistp.net>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1907221609330.19225@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CEECD0B0-7081-42DE-AA2C-5061749C9232@gmail.com> <87sgqy3sqh.fsf@toke.dk>
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/1NGOSLxH9vxiwbsizELoWI_Vp5Q>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] [Ecn-sane] is FQ actually widely deployed?
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 18:02:06 -0000

> On Jul 22, 2019, at 1:05 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> wrote:
> 
> Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>>> On 22 Jul, 2019, at 10:14 am, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Do we have numbers on how much FQ is actually out there? If we don't,
>>> can we measure it? Anyone know of devices shipping or being designed
>>> that does FQ of some kind?
>> 
>> There's also a large French ISP which has done fq_codel on its last
>> mile for quite some time.
> 
> I am aware of at least two Danish and one Norwegian ISP that have
> deployed FQ-CoDel-based shapers either as their customer shapers in the
> backend or on CPEs.

In Czech, I’m aware at least of two WISPs that use it. It’s a good bet there
are more, as a company has popped up specifically targeting WISPs which
uses passive monitoring and fq_codel to measure and improve customer
qoe. It doesn’t take too much searching to find them.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email