[tsvwg] Weekly github digest (TSV Working Group GitHub Activity Summary)
Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 11 August 2024 08:16 UTC
Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C4DC14F6F2 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Aug 2024 01:16:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.708
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.708 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b="EhiKrarP"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="Ogi1p9vg"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KP9mftkGGNUd for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Aug 2024 01:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fhigh7-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh7-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.158]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D07D8C14F6AA for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Aug 2024 01:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfhigh.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B271151B2A for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Aug 2024 03:39:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 11 Aug 2024 03:39:23 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:from:from:in-reply-to :mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t= 1723361963; x=1723448363; bh=2mZaXLKM70m1i1w1cB0ZBory8Q1DXlUSB8e /bNqY0C4=; b=EhiKrarPsHuKOZJD6Wm9XdQL29uIGFBeUp+0Yhhffl+adszZc9q IqEURXhy9K1meK+siqEx8jAkuEwh9C5lVlCyMPgkKr08Do7brlNxAtTUppyH2pit +mJWpWGqT55UgmAaBIieATv0xtLoe9jiRY9e476kcxlasGTAxLqrpcwYHRyIpQSg x1UjWnjHdHkYz7oGHFKfsLJQoGv/dxJQQKi8U23C6TrUyLoCmn2iGCRPfkR5ZJ7w Jetl1bnmZargBbUDcUSItsWrkQloIsapj62Wa6xE1I1lIgFnqZrPt9yEgOn11nHI MHK+/DdOS+PSxD3J8LvQbReZg3ZlwlFC9+g==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:mime-version :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1723361963; x= 1723448363; bh=2mZaXLKM70m1i1w1cB0ZBory8Q1DXlUSB8e/bNqY0C4=; b=O gi1p9vgJdY/82bHloTL3MZqIt3UTeu/Za2DqBtUwiWrodJ6enf5o8cCX7zh+JS+7 NBEesHRfH0WTfspnK0Qmg6oHdxZBAMDVtXH8mcY9keU55evVGpcjqzpx69hAXyya 1h7yKUtmaNZ84asYIjnzKq22yCXdD88BIIS6bOzazGXHpOl7ubWTfJrG/RliVmWj wAVsMH7TyOV5+uOEOhA/9sYA6NpDrQfoekZRxYbBePfRfbFpkr03pHtmOOsQlrpb CKOz4Yqt3mmRN8u/Ak95S+F8e8zBtE0lpclzGvMBWVb0ZzyH9s1Vh1DCmpaW9S+j KNOr73vLBjlS0ub7Mqavw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:q2q4ZgWUh7DXYxilh1WCKQjXV5f_iR5wT8-MPZbDz4DINrwn6sUGtw> <xme:q2q4ZkmgSAv9a1OWVmT88Lo3mBIUyPfQ34v3O0TjfmPqNKdFzeLrrzpHcOwBq0tF8 8sSQwDjXPp7Tx2ZVQ>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:q2q4ZkYtmhZ1po_arR2PC24Ob2HHMCOLqAZnAnuEiqjvQ2O0Je_3jvV2XvAYkA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrleejgdduvdehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfu rfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucfpohcuuggrthgvuchfih gvlhguucdlgeelmdenucfjughrpegtggfhvffusegrtddtredttdejnecuhfhrohhmpeft vghpohhsihhtohhrhicutegtthhivhhithihucfuuhhmmhgrrhihuceuohhtuceoughopg hnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeefvddu teejvdefkeehieevuefgfefhteetveegffekffefteffvdelheduieetnecuffhomhgrih hnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedunecurfgrrhgrmhep mhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtpdhnsggprh gtphhtthhopedupdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehtshhvfihgsehi vghtfhdrohhrgh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:q2q4ZvWWvdlh_ER2xnaHMqf6srOAbL06iJf8VJO9Tk92yen5p9z8JA> <xmx:q2q4ZqkoeefjDs6IdA91v4iPBwHPMvWO3g7krrRNJzO5DeZCv6fGWQ> <xmx:q2q4ZkfC0POgwnNDiqUVEcURnBpvj2o3Mj2-oo3sXk8NFLEV0EoQtA> <xmx:q2q4ZsETgHw5uGVbTcq4i5Jzay9AiTcr2mi6y-SVszU14G_oS3kU1g> <xmx:q2q4ZvxBF6vufrwE-N37feuH-s6KtLPQrq0riLs6U0WlXdk3f-gN1ltK>
Feedback-ID: i1c3946f2:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Aug 2024 03:39:23 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============1322084270090857779=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20240811081614.D07D8C14F6AA@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2024 01:16:14 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: UHZIE5YPQGEYMWP7RIN3SKZUYWZ3FEFD
X-Message-ID-Hash: UHZIE5YPQGEYMWP7RIN3SKZUYWZ3FEFD
X-MailFrom: do_not_reply@mnot.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tsvwg.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [tsvwg] Weekly github digest (TSV Working Group GitHub Activity Summary)
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/1sdyT6osLyvC2c8SOC2c05zlV3M>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tsvwg-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tsvwg-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tsvwg-leave@ietf.org>
Issues
------
* tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options (+4/-1/š¬31)
4 issues created:
- Minor clarifications to Section 13, Rules for designing new options (by Mike-Heard)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/66
- Clarifications to UENC text (by Mike-Heard)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/65
- Refine the text in Section 11.7 regarding disabling REQ/RES (by Mike-Heard)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/64
- Enhance MRDS (or add another option) to advertise the maximum number of fragments that can be reassembled (by Mike-Heard)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/63
13 issues received 31 new comments:
- #63 Enhance MRDS (or add another option) to advertise the maximum number of fragments that can be reassembled (1 by Mike-Heard)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/63
- #62 Clarification when allowing both default and extended length formats for options < 255 bytes (1 by Mike-Heard)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/62
- #60 add pointer to UDP-ipfix (1 by Mike-Heard)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/60
- #54 CMH: Clarify the exact meaning of MRDS size (1 by Mike-Heard)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/54 [Editorial] [Proposed text in issue]
- #53 CMH: Simplify language stating that FRAG is not reported to the user. (1 by Mike-Heard)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/53 [Editorial] [Proposed text in issue]
- #52 MD/CMH: Change minimum reassembled UDP datagram size from 3000 to 2926 (17 by Mike-Heard, jtouch)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/52 [Proposed text in issue]
- #47 CMH: Apply "first instance only" rule to options received in fragments as well as in the surplus area (1 by Mike-Heard)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/47
- #43 ZS/CMH: Backwards compatibility with UDP (1 by zaheduzzaman)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/43 [Proposed text in issue]
- #42 GF/CMH/ZS: WGLC Comments - Use cases (2 by Mike-Heard, jtouch)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/42
- #40 Tom H: WGLC comments on Section 12: "UNSAFE options are not safe to ignore" (1 by Mike-Heard)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/40 [Proposed text in issue]
- #32 Med: WGLC Comments on Magic Number? (1 by boucadair)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/32 [Editorial] [Proposed text in issue]
- #30 Med: WGLC Comments on Frag (2 by Mike-Heard, boucadair)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/30
- #10 * Section 12: The inner if clauses in the pseudo-code seem to be inconsistent (1 by auerswal)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/10 [Expected resolved]
1 issues closed:
- CMH: Apply "first instance only" rule to options received in fragments as well as in the surplus area https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/47
Pull requests
-------------
* tsvwg/careful-resume (+1/-0/š¬1)
1 pull requests submitted:
- Proposal for a slightly different explantion of principles. (by huitema)
https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume/pull/52
1 pull requests received 1 new comments:
- #52 Proposal for a slightly different explantion of principles. (1 by huitema)
https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume/pull/52
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-udp-options-dplpmtud
* https://github.com/tsvwg/ietf-multipath-dccp
* https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume
* https://github.com/tsvwg/zero-checksum
* https://github.com/tsvwg/ietf-l4sops
* https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options
- [tsvwg] Weekly github digest (TSV Working Group Gā¦ Repository Activity Summary Bot