[tsvwg] closing L4S issue #25 on IPR
Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Tue, 28 January 2020 17:18 UTC
Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BD8D1200D8 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 09:18:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8SgLft62g8DZ for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 09:18:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf2b.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71B2D1200E0 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 09:18:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf2b.google.com with SMTP id u10so6623337qvi.2 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 09:18:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=K87WvcJEnysRTo7QQXBUXIeipJy+jLxTXSwpHGA9ERM=; b=abCGMo7ehSNqd4nI3nYZcTQUMb8PBh4uA+Ny1ZWiwIdOClYrKc1Xzd78wLUHTE6gs9 E9e6q29NDl+6ErUFVA46k3HxIJnLBKx7RDQaP72bnJW0cpxd9VMZFtWkZvcxU4nj4XcE bRHWSB29cj0tXAtcFF9/wfbVpjXQZKvDUp/L7pexRRALs9jcYt4EJyS+t7CEkB1qomT8 37qGANgKzgnpkkjKy2dK7bUHMBCZvXNhGNUy/wknfEwZgXUwDWHK1NRWmappcrw5NwXB KiJGHxNkZFeSh+UK8lqy5/O+6ZVjCxsV8BDrvz4FIHZhXOJBZ5k+Zg2U78zmSukRvJSA YLgw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=K87WvcJEnysRTo7QQXBUXIeipJy+jLxTXSwpHGA9ERM=; b=joCTlviOhIEHoDf2lIh3f33f+IKLpq3neUvRAVrzqtrkZIa8+Y5/t3J2X3OcXnYkt/ VbwANcV/EhydCQzJqc6IkBNZ/2GNpyqdoKMsqHQMHDpXjyxOzmqNaE+af3Ju0sYbo8Uo AdBvdWFIAkQNSqwJZsrzQTP8tw7YwG3TyDb6zcaxIXKvU7kO29vhY+igjWrElguPUWvv 3H4aW/K5rWTKUGRCkJr8T3HUAAZrSavHVJOhNRiJMbw5el15a9IDKgetKyWqe9WxThun G9zgJJHtRjnjwP8Sg5n7ljBVcz0t7RcdDMnvQPUjMoCZzUuiWD00XYZPWKIUrqGum2rH p4hw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWXpB2WD8B2cAhhd506UH/oFgytdyrIo1m7eOpjK7VPFy/0QJf0 AqfCJu9rGEhsw4QZQkC1O0mYAHuamTk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqypL35pYsHDX4FKBn/aSuiPzKq2yoc/bC3D3S3pCSlO66gKOIPpv9dxbRZoJFDGn9DPW3dr4w==
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:46c3:: with SMTP id g3mr22595274qvw.60.1580231931052; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 09:18:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.100.1.112] (rrcs-69-135-1-122.central.biz.rr.com. [69.135.1.122]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m27sm13205412qta.21.2020.01.28.09.18.50 for <tsvwg@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Jan 2020 09:18:50 -0800 (PST)
To: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Message-ID: <b4d57b04-4122-94a3-8091-1acaf730c060@mti-systems.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 12:18:47 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/3HlvIDOscqIszAVYQcEQlDYEe-8>
Subject: [tsvwg] closing L4S issue #25 on IPR
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 17:18:57 -0000
We're planning a virtual interim (WebEx) meeting next month with time to focus on L4S progress. The announcement went out yesterday to the mailing list: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/EkJxscIat25rBsX-F7mPVBEB0nk (details for WebEx participation will be sent out beforehand). In preparation, I'm trying to update the issue tracker, and hopefully close a few items based on progress. I will start a thread for each. Issue #25 was created to cover IPR concerns. For reference, the trac entry is: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/tsvwg/ticket/25 I think we have at least rough consensus that the IPR declarations are not a blocking concern. My plan is to put some text into the draft shepherd writeup(s) for the drafts with IPR linked, noting the discussion in the WG, and then close out this issue in the tracker. Please shout if this doesn't sound right.
- [tsvwg] closing L4S issue #25 on IPR Wesley Eddy
- Re: [tsvwg] opening L4S issue #28 on the dual que… Sebastian Moeller