[tsvwg] status on L4S terminology improvements
Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Tue, 28 July 2020 16:22 UTC
Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE053A0E91 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 09:22:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MlNrU8RdWsZJ for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 09:22:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x735.google.com (mail-qk1-x735.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::735]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66DDA3A0E8E for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 09:22:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x735.google.com with SMTP id b79so19175157qkg.9 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 09:22:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=m8jK62Fuv9hzpM8Z5A+fyTict9vLLug24kTj9YQUoxc=; b=TJvBu2Sa5mUUnloIihi6MIQcOlO84J84Z2iRBc++ifjfBNm9bR06m7bM02S4qItEPP hagkgMARM6YTdOWNoev9fu2FcatvRrnsGrk8uM9MeNBftm01yBIYjMEsw+QdlEDQ2hGS t1oaWHSMTBVFqz1PNyVUEPjEJrQHggdsKRwj0vMo8reL5jQXvwIn/rT9F2Ifhgz75mR7 UqSPwmEA18TlYpTz67ffmcaiKR7mmYXmJyCcN5Hs6G1RxBujnv5Qc2CSr6zEiDs+Y9I4 kWvA2lWYjMadC7CQ5AjSvLNxQrGsyjIJJ7KteIZ14k98tk2QcFj7r7ax6Z0YYhcb8xE3 OukQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=m8jK62Fuv9hzpM8Z5A+fyTict9vLLug24kTj9YQUoxc=; b=j3ei4Xn9ldQXjxyL0n8y11YEpojQJFGIW8/9OCzBA15195W5+CaDYwN8MNgogstMZM p2cfAHv2Oivig9nATq3WaRIBM22CjbjfCLsdynnq6x5ewGS8RStibbE/Cp8vyE1IY6WP gKAmHweXWFD1qZ+Mz+fM8n6gWsDGyKZAcZVYs+m9Q3HzN58c0Rq3FR2BdvftwG0CXR/r 1kD9w+0jaQVwuEQaQ3b0xe5eD0frAuT740AV8ffRoz8MAeqRxw0bsdUvTi4DgrVwg0/Z f81qbfNbODCIINRO0+WYpenPyPrf9v3OK2sIpDQioWnImqGzYOtKxlOtcvDZp2+tRpa2 g7QQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Kgepg3w0MFrPxo9SLcI+j6UjxVdKhHRLUR/ESmi/3pXMudAWt yiYpb7gs9v5Mj+NSDkw9FdtPr2q1nGB7HA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzu+8pS25jAMpcLeyt+PBJrc21/hZ+QeGOaTlZhWCaLHE81T3LiWl6YMeQ3PNsrUSQJodopwQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:91c1:: with SMTP id t184mr26707891qkd.241.1595953321364; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 09:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.6] (user-12l31c7.cable.mindspring.com. [69.81.133.135]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z72sm24275087qka.107.2020.07.28.09.22.00 for <tsvwg@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Jul 2020 09:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
To: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Message-ID: <154187e2-0ba6-9b9b-2234-2f5d7caa0eb5@mti-systems.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 12:21:59 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/3u_sus0G4wX3bUI7oIBmoQDkIK0>
Subject: [tsvwg] status on L4S terminology improvements
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 16:22:04 -0000
Interested parties should check over the current L4S drafts in regard to whether the last couple rounds of editing have fully addressed the tracker issue on "terminology improvements" (reduction of "hype", removal of "classic TCP", and checking all other uses of 'traditional', 'classic', and 'legacy'). https://trac.ietf.org/trac/tsvwg/ticket/27 It looks to me like Greg's comment at the bottom of that ticket summarizes the status decently, and this is now in need of other eyeballs to verify that this has been adequately addressed and can be closed.
- [tsvwg] status on L4S terminology improvements Wesley Eddy
- Re: [tsvwg] status on L4S terminology improvements Scharf, Michael
- Re: [tsvwg] status on L4S terminology improvements Bob Briscoe