Return-Path: X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FCAB21F8B35 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 03:23:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.769 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.769 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.092, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YNWoUzrFrzxZ for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 03:23:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com (mail-pz0-f45.google.com [209.85.210.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B4C21F8839 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 03:23:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so1646907pzk.18 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 03:24:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/mRknf0PNDmzFfU/gvKP03ysaLXmZiK08T9mBRDEWL8=; b=N/6GN8AgrlMWPVOTS182OjhYgGBsKcKKg7d/GyoNtqNefEyQdYJRyNc2p2gBeDp54J 8BMp6P7ZWGt2UccG8oI13rYI9x8Omp6dhckQFU0jvrthmeFsTq7gndp7zHw7o2mhKFgu /4NqE6GYJnIMxWwqG7W0h+WIw72Xkmyc/aw5o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.208.13 with SMTP id f13mr2784047wfg.146.1314181454622; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 03:24:14 -0700 (PDT) Sender: yoshifumi.nishida@gmail.com Received: by 10.142.88.11 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 03:24:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 03:24:14 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Qjn4Ap1W9Q4xjjoHp9BnEgB591g Message-ID: Subject: Re: Comments regarding draft-nishida-tsvwg-sctp-failover-03.txt From: Yoshifumi Nishida To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Michael_T=FCxen?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: tsvwg list X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Transport Area Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 10:23:07 -0000 Hi Michael, Thank you so much for the review. Most points were addressed by Preethi. So, I just would like to clarify one point. 2011/8/22 Michael T=FCxen : > > =A0 o =A0When the sender receives an heartbeat ACK from a PF destination, > =A0 =A0 =A0the sender clears the destination's error counter and transiti= ons > =A0 =A0 =A0the PF destination back to active state. =A0This state transit= ion > =A0 =A0 =A0MUST NOT be notified to the ULP unless it is explicitly reques= ted. > =A0 =A0 =A0This destination's cwnd is set to 1 MTU (TODO: or 2? =A0Needs = more > =A0 =A0 =A0text discussing rationale; can revisit later?) > > We don't have defined a notification. I don't see the value > of it. So maybe you want to get rid of it? Hmm. I might miss your point, but I believe we cannot use arbitrary value.. Shall we refer 7.2.1 in RFC4960? -- Yoshifumi Nishida nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp