Re: [tsvwg] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud-19: (with COMMENT)

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> Thu, 09 April 2020 13:50 UTC

Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB19C3A0B74; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 06:50:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YAhf9ncvUopy; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 06:50:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x241.google.com (mail-lj1-x241.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20A6F3A0BA8; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 06:50:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x241.google.com with SMTP id z26so7400914ljz.11; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 06:50:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=PJMxYKVi2EVgssiY6OQMC4CMxHmBc8q2ZtkORzludiM=; b=E2VuIjpvrlQJ1rPz11ULLUVdsnurzvA7VQZth/CEYziStvRwkaEuz6tTWELmiBxZaw tTBTLU5y1aFW7vLF47uSEsxB8PHYvsK6nHr70QQFvOW9fU8NSpZby8RpukubdcjcCGth vsT0I6Rry9UvOj+3D2UcTBx+HDvpS4gxrN2EJ5rysKYjJjvfxxaGs/t3hdkqEaXs2mCO Zdhx3hT7/wAyhtgsBChKgNvny46FezrJSSEKL2D2lUc6UhuZfDLRwghl7ffz6CZRLM/K H663Elmo3gZ+I/oPEpIQGLKbN7wCK9WpZuJgqE8qkNyhIarQ93yWM1PvKQoqUGvNZBet LYAQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=PJMxYKVi2EVgssiY6OQMC4CMxHmBc8q2ZtkORzludiM=; b=bp6BN5F241wSedrWkhEeUtW9J0cpAe86lQq0GRtOh46zMfWi9QM+1o+qREs2SDBdCt iWa8xk7SFRYpOF7S0stvbjkouvz/lyukB/ioxs1WU4LOpyAbA5Useh9NEhvK7179vatO gcwQgY4oniCoqTguG2bsCALEMOOjpDuDNw2iriw23YudvOel/UcaAFRp/obkuxWCvqRU tDeyjpAIL5EPR7WbKPg4VPNkClugzQXJup9963DVVwsiZDLTgB19rN87MXEBJ82cDcjA 450tCMjwSF3988HiB5hiKjeq6WgApoNLbB03zRJn+Odpuc2qPGBa0vvQ/+wJXQi+ODOo /Y3w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaB7TYFW/o+0nshQFsFoL483bgRC6EGZf66265O+8wCUUQC7mq0 WoPzyzTkEYLl7VKudPQaQ58=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKOoxRyatUu1q6Rw5zdwXaEV8KM1SFCT54ZbeLaCPiA13KvMdFUN8vhoOM+S7/ZW9TbHKRwSQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:3c08:: with SMTP id j8mr8639137lja.243.1586440201197; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 06:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jonathartonsmbp.lan (83-245-250-250-nat-p.elisa-mobile.fi. [83.245.250.250]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b21sm19579754ljo.54.2020.04.09.06.50.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Apr 2020 06:50:00 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8edb8b70-6348-b14c-905d-f504b97d5923@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 16:49:59 +0300
Cc: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke?= <evyncke@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud@ietf.org, tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org, tsvwg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6BF059EA-94AD-4F4A-90C8-F8D65AFFA696@gmail.com>
References: <158643774827.7059.14728691009658122346@ietfa.amsl.com> <8edb8b70-6348-b14c-905d-f504b97d5923@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
To: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/6coQm49_v9U9Ob7bcDXWvSuVGrE>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-iet?= =?utf-8?q?f-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud-19=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 13:50:43 -0000

> On 9 Apr, 2020, at 4:32 pm, Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
>> -- Section 2 --
>> Looking for details in " A Packet is the IP header plus the IP payload." is it
>> worth mentioning the IPv6 extension headers or using "IP headers" (plural form)
>> ?
> 
> Yes. Good point. We will say the plural, but add a sentence after to be sure this is not overlooked!

Is it enough to say "IP header(s)"?  The brackets both make the plurality optional, and visually highlight its possibility.

 - Jonathan Morton