IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] UDP options and header-data split (zero copy)

Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Mon, 02 August 2021 22:54 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC8D53A1795 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 15:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.317
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.317 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kztC83Iz-cn2 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 15:54:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-4.web-hosting.com (server217-4.web-hosting.com [198.54.116.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4513B3A1F43 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 15:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Sender: Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender :Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=kLxgiF0anAnnmwvTcOfjn84wn6Z7ctDUeMWCRjUbDb8=; b=khCdfRogLK/kYo2H3ixEge9ssI Zxvami9EZlwAyagiEKcrCw0qqo0O+JemcFLOXEhdf4lORf3A1Z23dmfA1z6PIySU68Q4b9lEupt89 iEFJ+lDz24RkGM4LvyStcZrR/cPB9xZNyvfdt3zSgf28pHbQJkJ+dv4wUH12+QVqQvFLazIge3HjH V1qnY+8wPL+qMSxPFk98C8rEhWhs2VthtP5Rhi6ASKVW+6dRz2h/a/RaGWy+51ZawQ1nx2bLiYNhI 24kmscCY/2K6DU79wvhcgfL4lQ64K4dHO5CyYcMtmWC+8MxTTX6J8Ums06Ih7HD9Vc5DRJlJLTf4+ 1juaX7HQ==;
Received: from cpe-172-114-237-88.socal.res.rr.com ([172.114.237.88]:56232 helo=smtpclient.apple) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1mAgpI-003dLl-6P; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 18:54:32 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-C04D5062-5AFC-4AB7-80BC-65AFAD75981A"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACL_3VH-2gL8LXPt79NtSFnD7qV6g7exYE3SNVuZSfDawwSPqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2021 15:54:27 -0700
Cc: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>, Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>, TSVWG <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <B6D2556F-0746-43D3-8FE8-B284AB2B68C3@strayalpha.com>
References: <CACL_3VH-2gL8LXPt79NtSFnD7qV6g7exYE3SNVuZSfDawwSPqQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18G82)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/6qUhUKOLl78koatrpWl28PQMVLU>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] UDP options and header-data split (zero copy)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2021 22:54:39 -0000


> On Aug 2, 2021, at 3:13 PM, C. M. Heard <heard@pobox.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 12:31 PM Joe Touch wrote:
> 
>> At a minimum, because there are options that could be used in either place, eg. OCS, AUTH, and ENCR at least.
> 
> The per-fragment OCS icovers both the fragment data and the options. Is there really a justification for a per-datagram version? I think not ... though of course opinions vary ...

It would be a reassembly check, if that were desired. 

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email