IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] RDMA Support by UDP FRAG Option

Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com> Sun, 20 June 2021 16:42 UTC

Return-Path: <tom@herbertland.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3889B3A1C79 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Jun 2021 09:42:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=herbertland-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nuuUsV7ZkDKC for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Jun 2021 09:42:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x532.google.com (mail-ed1-x532.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::532]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 179BC3A1C74 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Jun 2021 09:42:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x532.google.com with SMTP id t7so15640457edd.5 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Jun 2021 09:42:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=herbertland-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dn1MSWaiRSwVAdB/TaDUv/lNY+OwFBNs9GqOKxwuA2k=; b=DHpx8J0CpYKv3q+yUFUdJ2ocFAkWd0ZctGavZIXIUKIQx/5k3pUkBcGpuhFemOphPA 7VXl4at7ZODvbPMmJY3gWTv/QLehUGmSl5rwqiwkiwsfdRcr14FpzcoZQUwFUZ8xYpV/ Kbg55KwmGloKYSKrNDr8b5KoM41o/q67h+EwZnyQqUG+L/qqQZhjlVtdcYHm2QaJbsbq HdKSeSp9LFWU2QSt4k1flfj6bNinCRrDDrZN9MQPEpAT8lQQ6r1Dkk6lG5QgCO52v5kz V+MbHylGBbX9tznNvR+if9iYN0LXqAcH2wET84mh0ifKtGVt7cF7JNLyhsiFW+apgm8A w92w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dn1MSWaiRSwVAdB/TaDUv/lNY+OwFBNs9GqOKxwuA2k=; b=J0hrMkGO/MkluALVMhv1fqrQqCHzheiJLEP08u3W99zlSNWAZo6blC8KALtYVIxZrD sjx8i5ffG8jo7xmDCjMjG1kHPDrHaI6Dv6gU4R7dQorgO+265h+srBcRSBEMIWFWBi05 CPHYEJ0LI0CVBQIy3kCZvYyOvJX59c1NN6HEdKpb/FdXK4Zpo+IkJskVvHkqebEs66DK c2l+Ob3pZ2KY0I+Jrvd68cBI85q2GtehlquDCkoTxZvO8R+JO6jSO4fM9xziztTsPwmQ T5BdJ03fd48EsFdhzysRJbRJCs07ngVye6wpR4rdN4UPw7TCCLvVrz6Dh7fKq2bSS7ZN XzNg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530/Q5qjTh/Fj9gp/ha1ZkzCRfBf/FUDojhu6hmX4GeE0rnacDX0 xJTcp1V6cIslrLjkalvGGNA6KwMfVzl0Hn6sHxo/bqtoHumA3EHH
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyumuZopdNJCwbla6BsnV2x2fdXgI5V7zJIIv9wrxVWJcv9DxiE91YtwZVFPOa5rqFxgVMjcbnvTjYTHFHq7tM=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:26c7:: with SMTP id x7mr16774173edd.383.1624207330967; Sun, 20 Jun 2021 09:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACL_3VEyLdQZ-3hvzXxyA8ehtWs2hXESZ2OqyAx+BeSg85+-cA@mail.gmail.com> <CACL_3VFE4TjKvmkfZjvNpWo6vVfKjz5w85=Q+yqnYZKcwbYLmQ@mail.gmail.com> <63FFC34B-2179-47F1-B325-21CAC3D1543A@strayalpha.com> <CACL_3VHTfxWaBj7TFEmBXBqovrrAj7XuFEZFUag_iBHr3Hx09g@mail.gmail.com> <0EBFC9B0-591A-4860-B327-6E617B83F4D1@strayalpha.com> <CALx6S34pT81TbfQDk2vKF8wBrXL312As79K=rEzUQ3Lmg7UvpA@mail.gmail.com> <7C51D926-9DBB-41F5-93B2-10F716F672B1@strayalpha.com> <CALx6S37uN8TsXQZ3cv5jmxwxSyBRjK=-GQ_MsWxPWSs21XoGHw@mail.gmail.com> <CACL_3VEx7+VnLz7OLdXyhZU41e+-oBz3dc8JdMV_7pLMfic6=w@mail.gmail.com> <fcc8762f-c042-7999-d2e4-f28384950a19@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <CALx6S36sWGcZmFpAhF4DfOMyf6Z0w5F9bemNfeM1yWV-r0M+BA@mail.gmail.com> <8af3abf9-943f-13c1-e239-5efca27cf68c@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <CACL_3VHdyLAmzMbWsTVfJD+4tTzsMvcTzKS1B1CAdZ3k5U957g@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S34DUrUBYd94LPPg4Hgh0FnZYZjZ4eKEYuaxb-7zbzb=pQ@mail.gmail.com> <F2C7D790-4037-4D41-B30D-0F66AF084635@strayalpha.com> <CALx6S37VN_GyyQ7E_rnNCOG2tPS5wVR9jdGMjgy0aaAFYT7anQ@mail.gmail.com> <C9BB95CC-1A12-48B6-9E90-8ED56EF40F27@strayalpha.com> <CALx6S36FK7NVzMTdh+aUSpBdXrfT5C=KsAwoVBR8gU06E0TW5g@mail.gmail.com> <EDFA3673-E833-48F7-87B5-2F806EEDAA0E@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <EDFA3673-E833-48F7-87B5-2F806EEDAA0E@strayalpha.com>
From: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2021 09:41:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CALx6S37+c6-Q0ySO8beaAkzd_nCMh5CYO0HgWnApZcwE6gjZbw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
Cc: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, TSVWG <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/7RxGef1JwykZPsEsv7Rx0ETXRPw>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] RDMA Support by UDP FRAG Option
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2021 16:42:23 -0000

On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 9:57 PM Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jun 19, 2021, at 3:07 PM, Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com> wrote:
>
> Joe,
>
> A nice thing about an open source project like Linux is that anyone who thinks there's a bug they can submit a patch and it will be accepted *if* you can justify the patch to the maintainers.
>
>
> And the bad thing is that they take lots of erroneous stuff too.
>
> The point is not whether those bugs exist or any of us need to care, it’s that they do not dicate our protocol designs.
>
> Bugs are bugs.
>

Joe,

All of this grandstanding and Linux bashing aside, technical issues
concerning UDP options are being raised that may be detrimental to the
running implementation or deployability of the protocol. I believe
these issues warrant a better answer than just calling them
implementation bugs and otherwise ignoring them.

Tom

> Joe

v2.40.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status