IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] Question regarding slide 3 of https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/materials/slides-106-tsvwg-sessb-31-tcp-prague-status-of-implementation-and-evaluation-00#page=3

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> Wed, 09 June 2021 15:00 UTC

Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E098D3A1ADE for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 08:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GNGZHP74fplS for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 08:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22e.google.com (mail-lj1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F3DC3A1AD9 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 08:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id r16so201081ljk.9 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 08:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=h+y/ALtN2fRsRA2djV596tAnLRzA5PwMkJ8HXJZwCP4=; b=E5azGA8T6xs7zLWjW6mrTq1z4byXXtxsP8YaPInGYEvP1kF2FQDiF4uZjwTUmyycQt gqa2h6Hl2kIOBRD6Ooj8Uaw5VtP8+wbDCrHglEHRY7W27Vw8b3NOK/fQ9ddyBjOUKkWc Fd/00p8NIpfe9pQEAWz9ap3knXCz6C1EZDJDutdV5b6sdqWR+SIIXah+tTZ2gLbLOKAf Qen0+lHXnl+/7vfF1Uwep8HLKqKvmMMXKbT/Q3BiT7NJ5deRl7olDlOLr8Se1Ggp0h7m qirdh2NGLMfnL6WmfmsvvVtnjvYiFnY03vV1yDt1m2zK+o0bdRu/HQVQ7x1OqJWlAAk1 4sDw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=h+y/ALtN2fRsRA2djV596tAnLRzA5PwMkJ8HXJZwCP4=; b=JZHb3cu17LBo1wWbHQnk0dxV9Lqo6ICoyAX+CDcpLMdLDgA1jmHNDf7Bcoz/RY+y4g 7uOU1QdNA+SVgRSGrUgYPdDTaMQdecPqAggVbVK1lGvaxibtLun9y5qM7vB/R2SkeaKO RatbkgjtONHKXxV5CDigHLIYF5/5VUCON7ZE5KQreNP7Un0M1BMoBFuvdQbg48E6fPwh zALzzBXvxXzaDPggv7afNT1eLd8c2682y5m7KFyZwUVdxbz0PcGpUOYPMK473qlrh7qh 6ESo/KqBK97jINqw3QMykN/i3fJFM5uZFRvYBaOdVLvoGN8MW3Sdfv5TzQovmx8nae6F EoxA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5338pMxmsyY4Eilsk/ATsFEEsdk739UVzPmQ8TPkKey+bGDKVlVC Xuw6VUaLNOLOimM5oc1EFDE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJznKZO3c2aX5d9u9qhd3+DFvR1BGIpFKjt9RJY1djgTZThHY/E13NE6+gXNtjNrSB/hS0bZcQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:86d4:: with SMTP id n20mr270748ljj.459.1623250799673; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 07:59:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jonathartonsmbp.lan (178-55-194-130.bb.dnainternet.fi. [178.55.194.130]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e4sm2268ljf.82.2021.06.09.07.59.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 09 Jun 2021 07:59:58 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.7\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM9PR07MB73131643CC45F6C63EA0B824B9369@AM9PR07MB7313.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 17:59:57 +0300
Cc: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>, TSVWG <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6F3937A0-A7DF-4211-AD2D-2E63340100BB@gmail.com>
References: <4D72E5C0-6EA6-4C90-9CD2-A94201806B22@gmx.de> <AM9PR07MB73131643CC45F6C63EA0B824B9369@AM9PR07MB7313.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
To: "De Schepper, Koen (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <koen.de_schepper@nokia-bell-labs.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/8En0RoDtROmGa61fKxIOo94o7gU>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Question regarding slide 3 of https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/materials/slides-106-tsvwg-sessb-31-tcp-prague-status-of-implementation-and-evaluation-00#page=3
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 15:00:08 -0000

> On 9 Jun, 2021, at 5:34 pm, De Schepper, Koen (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <koen.de_schepper@nokia-bell-labs.com> wrote:
> 
> ● exponential arrival process
> For reproducibility and fair comparison, we use a prepared scenario file that is generated as a exponential distribution with a average arrival rate of 100 requests per second in this (1h) case, played our 3 times as fast
> ● file sizes Pareto distr. α=0.9 1KB min 1MB max
> Again for reproducibility and fair comparison, we use a prepared request size file with the parameters specified

If I'm running the numbers correctly, the median request size would be a little over 2KB, the mean about 9KB, and the mean capacity occupied by this part of the traffic would be 21.54 Mbps.  Am I at least close to correct on that point?

 - Jonathan Morton

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status