IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] RDMA Support by UDP FRAG Option

"C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com> Mon, 21 June 2021 16:37 UTC

Return-Path: <heard@pobox.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D503A0F13 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 09:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cFVRPyt2kXOW for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 09:37:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (pb-smtp2.pobox.com [64.147.108.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 027693A0F09 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 09:37:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D28CD5E48 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 12:37:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h= mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject :to:cc:content-type; s=sasl; bh=uXNnV0laq/1905QM6yCAI94h1goG2PNN doIsaDVwvY0=; b=Qz19FxY66p6UQjKfb3+4BVUrvOtC3Br49KmeT7xdZ6dmUpeC 7+DU15s539YGbXfD1M3OKldzDIT7ukLXgdSG6APOmd0CNj4HfXbQ5fQF/L1Si+lX MbnvdScFGShaJxGLT1TGtOJc9im7H+/WpKGLEUJdBpP//me6mlVmX+nzGkk=
Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35718D5E47 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 12:37:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
Received: from mail-il1-f178.google.com (unknown [209.85.166.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9FC8FD5E45 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 12:37:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
Received: by mail-il1-f178.google.com with SMTP id h3so15854983ilc.9 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 09:37:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Qtam0ptdqMkbv2+TbFBJF88PmmV4PCYO/kUgx62ptSgn3ph2P ifwreExq8u8oampkhcEtqBzPMMD44W1pV+RSHZU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxfG0W7tiVliP8RPVs5deQy7XNdESuj/kjbD88Z2OCbhrLk0/bNP/7JXHtl0R0lJgD+z07Z5KIDF9qmOqXM4cE=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:dcc4:: with SMTP id b4mr18465943ilr.183.1624293448822; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 09:37:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACL_3VEyLdQZ-3hvzXxyA8ehtWs2hXESZ2OqyAx+BeSg85+-cA@mail.gmail.com> <CACL_3VFE4TjKvmkfZjvNpWo6vVfKjz5w85=Q+yqnYZKcwbYLmQ@mail.gmail.com> <63FFC34B-2179-47F1-B325-21CAC3D1543A@strayalpha.com> <CACL_3VHTfxWaBj7TFEmBXBqovrrAj7XuFEZFUag_iBHr3Hx09g@mail.gmail.com> <0EBFC9B0-591A-4860-B327-6E617B83F4D1@strayalpha.com> <CALx6S34pT81TbfQDk2vKF8wBrXL312As79K=rEzUQ3Lmg7UvpA@mail.gmail.com> <7C51D926-9DBB-41F5-93B2-10F716F672B1@strayalpha.com> <CALx6S37uN8TsXQZ3cv5jmxwxSyBRjK=-GQ_MsWxPWSs21XoGHw@mail.gmail.com> <CACL_3VEx7+VnLz7OLdXyhZU41e+-oBz3dc8JdMV_7pLMfic6=w@mail.gmail.com> <fcc8762f-c042-7999-d2e4-f28384950a19@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <CALx6S36sWGcZmFpAhF4DfOMyf6Z0w5F9bemNfeM1yWV-r0M+BA@mail.gmail.com> <8af3abf9-943f-13c1-e239-5efca27cf68c@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <CACL_3VHdyLAmzMbWsTVfJD+4tTzsMvcTzKS1B1CAdZ3k5U957g@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S34DUrUBYd94LPPg4Hgh0FnZYZjZ4eKEYuaxb-7zbzb=pQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACL_3VEq9R=HmWXGbu_zcrgWfG0=q0z+HWM3cQ9Vh68hTCUR-w@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S35bdGwY8FagGn8x5CaO4O3zW3U+NnB5ejC7bB6BHsXtJg@mail.gmail.com> <CACL_3VFwUJzT7uiXh33gBffboqqb51uFWJAEh290SsD0=aAzaQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S34Lai=YS8i1VTC1zKHqsCTt_XUeKfwob7Qe_BA49bHC3A@mail.gmail.com> <CACL_3VFZphux8uCqh6seVgTEjyjOhCjGd-jHtdGc0fR9opKWUg@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S34Yrph523yd0vx9EsCscwrjJY2ek6VrEj+7zCDGTLyuPA@mail.gmail.com> <48E7C759-957B-4E96-8A55-581AC40E5B28@strayalpha.com> <CALx6S36diVj2cd3JKBhvhA7xv3X5Wne9YO+v2sThX9jD-5tbEQ@mail.gmail.com> <F3DA8FA4-D335-42D2-B5F4-7DFDC866A2CA@strayalpha.com> <CALx6S35GJC_fq8wnehGSHY7WTW7YU7NA4wOSNoEGUF5w+pNx6g@mail.gmail.com> <4BA67B6B-E60F-474B-AD78-1FED2C3A58AD@strayalpha.com> <CALx6S36QNH9EvFB-mSHJMokFxHUFqv=16FMbAT=y1h7oGb7JEg@mail.gmail.com> <D2BB7DC3-D017-48AF-9886-0798CA333F90@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <D2BB7DC3-D017-48AF-9886-0798CA333F90@strayalpha.com>
From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 09:37:17 -0700
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CACL_3VFQR_G5zgjbNiBH3Xu7Dvp+rOXUhNnJ2s4eDwZgq+e-=w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACL_3VFQR_G5zgjbNiBH3Xu7Dvp+rOXUhNnJ2s4eDwZgq+e-=w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
Cc: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>, Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, TSVWG <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000007373305c5494af7"
X-Pobox-Relay-ID: F84B0D54-D2AE-11EB-B55D-FD8818BA3BAF-06080547!pb-smtp2.pobox.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/9CnkymQtAD69V92A0rKm6VU67wY>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] RDMA Support by UDP FRAG Option
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 16:37:38 -0000

On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 8:48 AM Joseph Touch wrote:

> …
> > In my opinion, the best chance for UDP options to be deployable and
> > successful is to require that the surplus area always sums to zero.
>
> When UDP CS==0, OCS provides that capability.


It would, if the requirement for a receiver to check OCS when it is present
were dropped when UCP CS==0.

If that's not in -13, I'll make a comment requesting it.

Thanks for bringing this up.

Mike

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status