Re: [tsvwg] Network congestion, dynamic lossless compression?
Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> Sun, 04 August 2019 10:08 UTC
Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4C9120025 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Aug 2019 03:08:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.748
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LyF1zb2arqMq for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Aug 2019 03:08:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x434.google.com (mail-wr1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::434]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 632C612000F for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Aug 2019 03:08:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x434.google.com with SMTP id c2so78249653wrm.8 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 04 Aug 2019 03:08:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kajrRtMdeYaTobgbuakij3toG9Rd9ZWb9yzMKtEU2HI=; b=LL94n3DK2Wqey0ayMPjW+/ZywWk0QSea553DwEZwMH1/rX6Co072dbTDQEWQsJVL7+ E32yYamBEXm0hA2UDcLRfnE4Era2dbBUa6FLVonqbazYBuDqRIWIDh9H8bqgSU+uklMr lwoG5wMD1v/nBanCCeilfynRqv54jzCixQ6g87V7PuXseC68izdO21NUFnrdoG1KX9wJ HlFuBYAoV/XUgb8OK2SNH09vPR2n48/71rx+a0kVlaq4iK9HeZqV628rZGkUW9gEbJBh zOlRe8gmaGmuSLDXk8d+nbdt8nDu7RZxtyJywrcrdXWmgbV0NfevRtelAnp0tefAOqKj jrUQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kajrRtMdeYaTobgbuakij3toG9Rd9ZWb9yzMKtEU2HI=; b=gt08ozJdk17uZpsTKwver/18hDQga6B7DANEtLHImAPMKBUKrIJkiyQXP2yPdtwdNr vs0ZfHfwiSM7RqcwMsHP9tUj18P4VTRRrbahKKVmRApS9Jh5xu8VDcUJsdMG8HzwNzPg cK3PwmNUBGXeqSNvNoT8JsQQrVxgNPRa4YF5dGLnQq5HX4Sph/8CgBPG96WT+6VG5SC3 UcEmYKc7LyXF4oqbSaFZPzBS4BN1Pda7VN2CR2cAV0AP86Zn0XGL0pY6C/KnmF1P/cL7 P2B9gUMO1hdfHrBtXhEvom5ZLeScT5BsRUUjn3loum14ZZr5fa8cgIGWdYqaqpA97Wb3 qy6Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVakx5VH+3g9qggNARzWWPgHfGhkCN7I/WpThP85wnJBnBGW3Md aSuRFzvdkX0NPlraHZte4GY+izcEONQySz+vdsA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxso4XnNEpY2olcnJPwOfEodTVJtoSYNcspqBBeEOaN0H6/OrWtLctHNttMZTN+rhVnw4f3gv6GM3LN2lVeVD0=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:d081:: with SMTP id y1mr16077439wrh.34.1564913287820; Sun, 04 Aug 2019 03:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a1c:9e09:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Aug 2019 03:08:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 2002:a1c:9e09:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Aug 2019 03:08:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ba5a6e98-62e2-e353-aa84-094d11b4860d@isae-supaero.fr>
References: <240549020.737374.1564852426405.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <240549020.737374.1564852426405@mail.yahoo.com> <09CEC4BF-BA42-4339-A099-8AD7DE601289@gmail.com> <1229209003.735624.1564858976796@mail.yahoo.com> <ba5a6e98-62e2-e353-aa84-094d11b4860d@isae-supaero.fr>
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2019 13:08:06 +0300
Message-ID: <CAJq5cE2N80pGvNWEVViptXgSRkSnoxkQCB5_xcZ6J6hSp-neUA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Emmanuel Lochin <emmanuel.lochin@isae-supaero.fr>
Cc: tsvwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009ff9f8058f47c41e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/9ORfVuNi8rZzv89R4EMjWNZLQ3c>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Network congestion, dynamic lossless compression?
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2019 10:08:10 -0000
It should be straightforward to set up an experiment to figure out how much compression can be expected. Use tcpdump, capture a session containing some traffic of interest, then run say gzip -9 over the capture file and observe the compression ratio. Or for a more live analysis, Linux PPP supports two different compression options, so set up a rate limited link between two instances. - Jonathan Morton
- [tsvwg] Network congestion, dynamic lossless comp… David G. Pickett
- Re: [tsvwg] Network congestion, dynamic lossless … Jonathan Morton
- Re: [tsvwg] Network congestion, dynamic lossless … David G. Pickett
- Re: [tsvwg] Network congestion, dynamic lossless … Emmanuel Lochin
- Re: [tsvwg] Network congestion, dynamic lossless … Jonathan Morton